21.05.2014 Views

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.6 Weak lens<strong>in</strong>g analysis<br />

where θ is the position angle <strong>of</strong> an object with respect to the cluster center,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the g T measurement is σ T = σ g / √ 2 ≡ σ <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the RMS error σ g for the complex reduced-shear measurement. To improve<br />

the statistical significance <strong>of</strong> the distortion measurement, we calculate the<br />

weighted average <strong>of</strong> g T <strong>and</strong> its weighted error, as<br />

∑<br />

i<br />

〈g T (θ n )〉 =<br />

u g,i g<br />

∑ +,i<br />

, (3.3)<br />

i u g,i<br />

σ T (θ n ) =<br />

√ ∑<br />

i u2 g,i σ2 i<br />

( ∑ i u g,i) 2 , (3.4)<br />

where the <strong>in</strong>dex i runs over all <strong>of</strong> the objects located with<strong>in</strong> the nth annulus<br />

with a median radius <strong>of</strong> θ n , <strong>and</strong> u g,i is the <strong>in</strong>verse variance weight for ith<br />

object, u g,i = 1/(σg,i 2 + α 2 ), s<strong>of</strong>tened with α. We choose α = 0.4, which<br />

is a typical value <strong>of</strong> the mean RMS ¯σ g over the background sample. The<br />

case with α = 0 corresponds to an <strong>in</strong>verse-variance weight<strong>in</strong>g. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, the limit α ≫ σ g,i yields a uniform weight<strong>in</strong>g. We have confirmed that<br />

our results are <strong>in</strong>sensitive to the choice <strong>of</strong> α (i.e., <strong>in</strong>verse-variance or uniform<br />

weight<strong>in</strong>g) with the adopted smooth<strong>in</strong>g parameters.<br />

In Fig. 3.6 we plot the radial pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> g T <strong>of</strong> the green (pentagrams),<br />

red (triangles) <strong>and</strong> blue (circles) samples def<strong>in</strong>ed above. The black squares<br />

represent the red+blue comb<strong>in</strong>ed sample, show<strong>in</strong>g the best estimate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lens<strong>in</strong>g signal. The red <strong>and</strong> blue samples pr<strong>of</strong>iles rise cont<strong>in</strong>uously toward<br />

the center for each <strong>of</strong> the clusters, <strong>and</strong> are <strong>in</strong> good agreement with each<br />

other, demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g that both are dom<strong>in</strong>ated by background galaxies <strong>and</strong><br />

are not contam<strong>in</strong>ated by the cluster at all radii. The g T pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the green<br />

sample lies close to zero, especially at small radii, but shows a small positive<br />

signal at large radius, close <strong>in</strong> amplitude to the background signal measured<br />

above, mean<strong>in</strong>g at beyond ∼ 5 ′ there are few cluster members <strong>in</strong> comparison<br />

to “green” background galaxies. Indeed, the virial radius derived from our<br />

best fitt<strong>in</strong>g NFW model lies at about 10 ′ − 15 ′ <strong>and</strong> so physically it is reasonable<br />

that the cluster population is small here. The measured zero level<br />

<strong>of</strong> tangential distortion <strong>in</strong>terior to this radius for the green sample re<strong>in</strong>forces<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!