21.05.2014 Views

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.2 Gravitational Lens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

effects can range from slight biases aris<strong>in</strong>g from triaxiality <strong>of</strong> clusters, to large<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> the mass estimates due to l<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>of</strong>-sight mergers <strong>of</strong> clusters <strong>of</strong><br />

comparable sizes.<br />

1.2.4.2.2 <strong>Mass</strong>-Sheet Degeneracy Add<strong>in</strong>g a constant mass sheet to<br />

κ does not affect the image ellipticities, s<strong>in</strong>ce it causes only an isotropic<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> the images. This transformations is equivalent to scal<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Jacobian matrix A by some scalar multiple λA, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

A ′ = λA = λ<br />

(<br />

)<br />

1 − κ − γ 1 −γ 2<br />

−γ 2 1 − κ + γ 1<br />

which is equivalent to the follow<strong>in</strong>g transformations <strong>of</strong> κ <strong>and</strong> γ,<br />

, (1.49)<br />

1 − κ ′ = λ(1 − κ), γ ′ = λγ. (1.50)<br />

This transformation evidently leaves the reduced shear g = γ/(1 − κ) <strong>in</strong>variant<br />

under this scal<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong>variance ambiguity is referred to as the<br />

mass-sheet degeneracy. It was orig<strong>in</strong>ally discovered by Falco et al. (1985)<br />

<strong>and</strong> further highlighted by Schneider & Seitz (1995). The ambiguity can<br />

be broken by measur<strong>in</strong>g the magnification effect, because µ is not <strong>in</strong>variant<br />

under the transformation, as<br />

µ( ⃗ θ) → λ 2 µ( ⃗ θ). (1.51)<br />

Measur<strong>in</strong>g the magnification bias has been suggested by Broadhurst et al.<br />

(1995) us<strong>in</strong>g galaxy number-counts. Another approach is the use <strong>of</strong> wide-field<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>g with field-<strong>of</strong>-view larger than the clusters, <strong>in</strong> which case the lens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

effect vanishes at the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the field, thus break<strong>in</strong>g the degeneracy.<br />

1.2.4.2.3 PSF Effects The ma<strong>in</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> weak lens<strong>in</strong>g measurements<br />

is due to po<strong>in</strong>t-spread function (PSF) effects, aris<strong>in</strong>g from the telescope/CCD<br />

response <strong>and</strong>/or atmospheric see<strong>in</strong>g. The atmospheric see<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

which is a term describ<strong>in</strong>g the result <strong>of</strong> atmospheric turbulence, causes smear-<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!