21.05.2014 Views

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

Mass and Light distributions in Clusters of Galaxies - Henry A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Weak Lens<strong>in</strong>g Dilution <strong>in</strong> A1689<br />

g +<br />

−1<br />

0’−1’, ACS<br />

0.2<br />

−1.05<br />

1’−2’, ACS<br />

0.1<br />

2’−4’, Subaru<br />

−1.1 α<br />

0<br />

10 3 4’−8’, Subaru −1.15<br />

α=−1.046 M *<br />

=−21.46<br />

−1<br />

0.3<br />

−1.05<br />

g +<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

−1.1 α<br />

0<br />

10 2<br />

−1.15<br />

α=−1.059 M *<br />

=−20.77<br />

−1<br />

0.08<br />

g + 0.04<br />

−1.05<br />

−1.1 α<br />

−1.15<br />

0<br />

10 1<br />

α=−1.094 M *<br />

=−21.21<br />

0.06<br />

−1<br />

0.04<br />

−1.05<br />

g +<br />

−1.1<br />

0.02<br />

α<br />

−1.15<br />

0<br />

10 0<br />

α=−1.108 M *<br />

=−21.41<br />

−24 −22 −20 −18 −16 −14 −12 −24 −22 −20 −18 −16 −14 −12 −23 −22 −21 −20<br />

M i’<br />

M i’<br />

M *i’<br />

Φ(M) [h 2 Mpc −2 mag −1 ]<br />

Figure 2.16 – Center: Lum<strong>in</strong>osity functions are shown for four <strong>in</strong>dependent radial b<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g little trend with radius. The left-h<strong>and</strong> panel is the degree <strong>of</strong> tangential distortion<br />

g T as a function <strong>of</strong> magnitude used <strong>in</strong> the derivation <strong>of</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g lum<strong>in</strong>osity<br />

function. Notice that <strong>in</strong> general g T <strong>in</strong>creases with decreas<strong>in</strong>g lum<strong>in</strong>osity because the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> background <strong>in</strong>creases at fa<strong>in</strong>ter magnitudes. The right-h<strong>and</strong> panel shows the 1σ, 2σ, <strong>and</strong><br />

3σ contours for the Schechter function parameters M ∗ <strong>and</strong> α, for each <strong>of</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lum<strong>in</strong>osity functions.<br />

10 3 uncorrected<br />

corrected<br />

−10 0.151<br />

10 2<br />

−10 0.152<br />

Φ(M) [h 2 Mpc −2 mag −1 ]<br />

10 1<br />

10 0<br />

10 −1<br />

uncorrected, α=−1.421<br />

M i’<br />

−10 0.153<br />

−1<br />

−1.02<br />

−1.04<br />

α<br />

−1.06<br />

−1.08<br />

10 −2<br />

−24 −22 −20 −18 −16 −14<br />

M i’<br />

corrected, α=−1.048<br />

−24 −22<br />

M i’*<br />

−20 −1.1<br />

Figure 2.17 – Composite lum<strong>in</strong>osity function <strong>of</strong> the cluster (black squares), for r < 10 ′ ,<br />

with the fit to a Schechter function displayed <strong>in</strong> the lower right panel. The green circles<br />

show the lum<strong>in</strong>osity distribution without the correction made for the background dilution.<br />

At bright magnitudes, there is little difference between the uncorrected <strong>and</strong> the corrected<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts, however, at the fa<strong>in</strong>t end the uncorrected distribution rises, which if uncorrected<br />

would overestimate the fa<strong>in</strong>t end slope α ∼ 1.4 (top right panel), show<strong>in</strong>g clearly the<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> the background correction, which when accounted for by our method results<br />

a flat fa<strong>in</strong>t end slope, α ∼ 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!