10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8.6 Toy Monte Carlo study 121<br />
Since in almost all the cases the calculated χ 2 /ndf is strongly below one 5 , conclusion<br />
can be drawn that both methods extract the correct cross sections within their own<br />
determined uncertainties. As expected, unfolding produces consistently lower values of<br />
χ 2 , which points to it as a more reliable method. In addition, the impact of model<br />
inaccuracy can be observed, as χ 2 steadily rises with the reweight factor. The importance<br />
of proper model description seems to be more important for E γ T , as χ2 rises faster. The<br />
reason for that are much lower bin purities in case of E γ T bins compared to ηγ case.<br />
In figure 8.12 the results of the toy MC study with f toy<br />
E T ,η<br />
reweighting scheme are presented.<br />
One can see that given the amount of the distortion applied to the toy MC, both unfolding<br />
and fitting procedures fail to correctly determine the E γ T<br />
distribution, with unfolding being<br />
more correct in the lowest E γ T bin. In case of ηγ , unfolding manages to determine the<br />
correct distribution, while fitting fails to do so. In addition, the correlation between bins,<br />
taken into account in the unfolding procedure leads to an increase of the evaluated error.<br />
One may observe that fitting leads to systematically higher cross sections, which may be<br />
explained by the harder E γ T<br />
slope in the model used to extract the cross sections (see<br />
figure 8.<strong>10</strong>). That leads to the overestimation of migration from below E γ T<br />
= 6 GeV cut<br />
value. The unfolding better deals with this problem (see χ 2 /ndf values in table 8.7).<br />
[pb/GeV]<br />
γ<br />
dσ / dE T<br />
20<br />
15<br />
<strong>10</strong><br />
Toy MC<br />
Fitting (χ 2 /ndf=3.7)<br />
Unfolding (χ 2 /ndf=1.4)<br />
[pb]<br />
γ<br />
dσ / dη<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
Toy MC<br />
Fitting (χ 2 /ndf=3.3)<br />
Unfolding (χ 2 /ndf=0.1)<br />
20<br />
5<br />
<strong>10</strong><br />
0<br />
6 8 <strong>10</strong> 12 14<br />
[GeV]<br />
γ<br />
E T<br />
0<br />
-1 0 1 2<br />
γ<br />
η<br />
Figure 8.12: The E γ T and ηγ distribution of the toy Mc compared to the results obtained<br />
with the unfolding and fitting procedures.<br />
The bin-to-bin correction is known to produce unreliable results in case of large model<br />
inaccuracies, while unfolding is expected to produce correct results even with the particularly<br />
wrong model. One should note, that this is fully true only for high (infinite) number<br />
of output bins, where the discrete output shape can be considered as continuous and<br />
unfolding gets the full freedom in its adaptation. In practice though, the unfolding is limited<br />
by the data statistics and is only as good as correct is the model distribution within<br />
5 In addition, number of degrees of freedom is a small number: four for E γ T and five for ηγ .