23.05.2014 Views

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.6 Toy Monte Carlo study 121<br />

Since in almost all the cases the calculated χ 2 /ndf is strongly below one 5 , conclusion<br />

can be drawn that both methods extract the correct cross sections within their own<br />

determined uncertainties. As expected, unfolding produces consistently lower values of<br />

χ 2 , which points to it as a more reliable method. In addition, the impact of model<br />

inaccuracy can be observed, as χ 2 steadily rises with the reweight factor. The importance<br />

of proper model description seems to be more important for E γ T , as χ2 rises faster. The<br />

reason for that are much lower bin purities in case of E γ T bins compared to ηγ case.<br />

In figure 8.12 the results of the toy MC study with f toy<br />

E T ,η<br />

reweighting scheme are presented.<br />

One can see that given the amount of the distortion applied to the toy MC, both unfolding<br />

and fitting procedures fail to correctly determine the E γ T<br />

distribution, with unfolding being<br />

more correct in the lowest E γ T bin. In case of ηγ , unfolding manages to determine the<br />

correct distribution, while fitting fails to do so. In addition, the correlation between bins,<br />

taken into account in the unfolding procedure leads to an increase of the evaluated error.<br />

One may observe that fitting leads to systematically higher cross sections, which may be<br />

explained by the harder E γ T<br />

slope in the model used to extract the cross sections (see<br />

figure 8.<strong>10</strong>). That leads to the overestimation of migration from below E γ T<br />

= 6 GeV cut<br />

value. The unfolding better deals with this problem (see χ 2 /ndf values in table 8.7).<br />

[pb/GeV]<br />

γ<br />

dσ / dE T<br />

20<br />

15<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

Toy MC<br />

Fitting (χ 2 /ndf=3.7)<br />

Unfolding (χ 2 /ndf=1.4)<br />

[pb]<br />

γ<br />

dσ / dη<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

Toy MC<br />

Fitting (χ 2 /ndf=3.3)<br />

Unfolding (χ 2 /ndf=0.1)<br />

20<br />

5<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

0<br />

6 8 <strong>10</strong> 12 14<br />

[GeV]<br />

γ<br />

E T<br />

0<br />

-1 0 1 2<br />

γ<br />

η<br />

Figure 8.12: The E γ T and ηγ distribution of the toy Mc compared to the results obtained<br />

with the unfolding and fitting procedures.<br />

The bin-to-bin correction is known to produce unreliable results in case of large model<br />

inaccuracies, while unfolding is expected to produce correct results even with the particularly<br />

wrong model. One should note, that this is fully true only for high (infinite) number<br />

of output bins, where the discrete output shape can be considered as continuous and<br />

unfolding gets the full freedom in its adaptation. In practice though, the unfolding is limited<br />

by the data statistics and is only as good as correct is the model distribution within<br />

5 In addition, number of degrees of freedom is a small number: four for E γ T and five for ηγ .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!