23.05.2014 Views

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 Photon selection 65<br />

cells adjacent to the cracks are removed from the selected sample. In addition the most<br />

energetic cell of the cluster is required to be part of the LAr calorimeter wheel in which<br />

most of the cluster’s energy is deposited. This requirement removes any ambiguity in<br />

assigning cluster to particular LAr calorimeter wheel.<br />

Clusters with an electromagnetic energy fraction in the first two layers (E γ EM2<br />

) of the<br />

calorimeter above a certain threshold are selected. The threshold function has been chosen<br />

such as to minimise possible efficiency losses. Figure 5.2 presents the E γ EM2<br />

fraction for<br />

photon initiated clusters (a) and for hadrons in example of charged pions (b) as a function<br />

of polar angle θ γ together with the threshold function. The energy fraction for photons<br />

depends on the polar angle due to the difference in angle of impact and thus difference<br />

in accessible electromagnetic part of calorimeter. More importantly, it is sensitive to<br />

differences of the structure of LAr calorimeter wheels. A significant change is visible<br />

around θ ∼ 50 ◦ where horizontal absorber planes of CB3 change to vertical absorber<br />

planes of FB1. The very low threshold function (20 ◦ < θ < 30 ◦ ) corresponds to FB2 wheel,<br />

where the first layer contains G<strong>10</strong> material instead of lead. One can note that photons<br />

can be found generally above the cut function, while for hadrons the energy fraction in<br />

the first two layers in the calorimeter is usually below 5%. The high electromagnetic<br />

fractions produced by hadrons for backward detector region (∼ 140 ◦ ) correspond to the<br />

edge of hadronic LAr calorimeter.<br />

γ<br />

EM2<br />

E<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 <strong>10</strong>0 120 140 160 180<br />

γ<br />

θ [deg]<br />

γ<br />

EM2<br />

E<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 <strong>10</strong>0 120 140 160 180<br />

γ<br />

θ [deg]<br />

Figure 5.2: The electromagnetic energy fraction in the first two layers of LAr calorimeter<br />

of photon clusters (a) and hadron clusters (b) together with the threshold function.<br />

The trigger correction, as discussed in section 4.3.2 is defined by the position and energy<br />

of the photon candidate with the assumption that the candidate itself enabled the trigger<br />

during the online trigger selection. Since this assumption is not necessary always true,<br />

special attention has been paid to ensure its validity. Figure 5.3 presents the difference<br />

between candidate cluster and the closest enabled BT (see section 4.3.1) in pseudorapidity<br />

and azimuthal angle. One can see the greatest majority of the clusters correspond to an<br />

active BT nearby. Interesting observation can be made for a small, but still visible fraction<br />

of events where cluster failed to trigger the BT, while the accompanying jet managed to<br />

do it. Since jet in most cases balances the photon in azimuthal angle φ, those events can<br />

be seen close to ∆φ ∼ π as a clearly visible peak two orders of magnitudes lower than the<br />

main one. In order to avoid ambiguity of the trigger correction, a cut was introduced on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!