10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.2 Photon selection 65<br />
cells adjacent to the cracks are removed from the selected sample. In addition the most<br />
energetic cell of the cluster is required to be part of the LAr calorimeter wheel in which<br />
most of the cluster’s energy is deposited. This requirement removes any ambiguity in<br />
assigning cluster to particular LAr calorimeter wheel.<br />
Clusters with an electromagnetic energy fraction in the first two layers (E γ EM2<br />
) of the<br />
calorimeter above a certain threshold are selected. The threshold function has been chosen<br />
such as to minimise possible efficiency losses. Figure 5.2 presents the E γ EM2<br />
fraction for<br />
photon initiated clusters (a) and for hadrons in example of charged pions (b) as a function<br />
of polar angle θ γ together with the threshold function. The energy fraction for photons<br />
depends on the polar angle due to the difference in angle of impact and thus difference<br />
in accessible electromagnetic part of calorimeter. More importantly, it is sensitive to<br />
differences of the structure of LAr calorimeter wheels. A significant change is visible<br />
around θ ∼ 50 ◦ where horizontal absorber planes of CB3 change to vertical absorber<br />
planes of FB1. The very low threshold function (20 ◦ < θ < 30 ◦ ) corresponds to FB2 wheel,<br />
where the first layer contains G<strong>10</strong> material instead of lead. One can note that photons<br />
can be found generally above the cut function, while for hadrons the energy fraction in<br />
the first two layers in the calorimeter is usually below 5%. The high electromagnetic<br />
fractions produced by hadrons for backward detector region (∼ 140 ◦ ) correspond to the<br />
edge of hadronic LAr calorimeter.<br />
γ<br />
EM2<br />
E<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 <strong>10</strong>0 120 140 160 180<br />
γ<br />
θ [deg]<br />
γ<br />
EM2<br />
E<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 <strong>10</strong>0 120 140 160 180<br />
γ<br />
θ [deg]<br />
Figure 5.2: The electromagnetic energy fraction in the first two layers of LAr calorimeter<br />
of photon clusters (a) and hadron clusters (b) together with the threshold function.<br />
The trigger correction, as discussed in section 4.3.2 is defined by the position and energy<br />
of the photon candidate with the assumption that the candidate itself enabled the trigger<br />
during the online trigger selection. Since this assumption is not necessary always true,<br />
special attention has been paid to ensure its validity. Figure 5.3 presents the difference<br />
between candidate cluster and the closest enabled BT (see section 4.3.1) in pseudorapidity<br />
and azimuthal angle. One can see the greatest majority of the clusters correspond to an<br />
active BT nearby. Interesting observation can be made for a small, but still visible fraction<br />
of events where cluster failed to trigger the BT, while the accompanying jet managed to<br />
do it. Since jet in most cases balances the photon in azimuthal angle φ, those events can<br />
be seen close to ∆φ ∼ π as a clearly visible peak two orders of magnitudes lower than the<br />
main one. In order to avoid ambiguity of the trigger correction, a cut was introduced on