23.05.2014 Views

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.7 Corrections to the QCD calculations 127<br />

analysis bin i a ±δ PDF is calculated according to:<br />

+ δ PDF<br />

i<br />

−δ PDF<br />

i<br />

= max j ( Nj i − Nref i<br />

N ref<br />

i<br />

= max j ( Nref i − N j i<br />

N ref<br />

i<br />

) × <strong>10</strong>0%, (8.54)<br />

) × <strong>10</strong>0%, (8.55)<br />

where N ref<br />

i is the number of events in the bin i produced with the reference PDF set and<br />

index j runs over all the PDF sets, including the reference one.<br />

For the uncertainty applied to the FGH calculation (see section 2.2.1), the reference<br />

cross section was chosen to be the one produced with CTEQ6L proton PDF and AFG04<br />

photon PDF, as exactly this set was used during calculations. Since the chosen PDF set<br />

consistently produces the lowest cross sections in the studied phase space, the resulting<br />

error is highly asymmetric.<br />

The ZL calculation (see section 2.2.2) uses the k ⊥ unintegrated PDF, which could not be<br />

easily applied to the MC. For that purpose, the compromise solution was found, to use<br />

the same PDF uncertainty as evaluated for FGH, but apply it in a symmetric way.<br />

Figure 8.17 presents the PDF uncertainty obtained for the final cross sections, as applied<br />

to the both sets of calculations. The choice of the PDF arises to the leading uncertainty<br />

source in most of the studied phase space being on average slightly below <strong>10</strong>% and reaching<br />

even 15% in some bins of resolved enhanced phase space.<br />

Due to possible cancellations, special attention was taken to ensure correct multiplication<br />

of the different corrections. The ftheor MPI correction, being the first correction applied to the<br />

calculation was determined studying the MC on parton level and with a cone isolation<br />

criteria. The ftheor isol correction was determined with MCs including MPI, but still on parton<br />

level. And finally, for the determination of the third correction, ftheor had , both MCs were<br />

generated with MPI and the cross section phase space was already based on a z variable.<br />

In this way, the final correction factor f theor may be calculated with a reduced formula 7 :<br />

f theor<br />

= f MPI<br />

theor × f isol<br />

theor × f had<br />

= N had,z,MPI<br />

i<br />

theor (8.56)<br />

/N par,cone,∼MPI<br />

i , (8.57)<br />

where N par,cone,∼MPI<br />

i is the number of events in bin i on parton level, with cone based<br />

isolation and without MPI (the phase space directly calculated by the QCD calculations),<br />

while N had,z,MPI<br />

i is the number of events in bin i on hadron level, with z-based isolation<br />

and with MPI (the phase space being the result of the measurement).<br />

All the theory corrections ftheor MPI,<br />

fisol theor , fhad theor , together with their uncertainties and the<br />

PDF uncertainty δ PDF are listed in the relevant tables in appendix C.<br />

7 In practice though, the correction is calculated with an extended triple correction formula, due to<br />

the ftheor had correction determination method, which includes the usage of two different MC generators.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!