10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8.7 Corrections to the QCD calculations 127<br />
analysis bin i a ±δ PDF is calculated according to:<br />
+ δ PDF<br />
i<br />
−δ PDF<br />
i<br />
= max j ( Nj i − Nref i<br />
N ref<br />
i<br />
= max j ( Nref i − N j i<br />
N ref<br />
i<br />
) × <strong>10</strong>0%, (8.54)<br />
) × <strong>10</strong>0%, (8.55)<br />
where N ref<br />
i is the number of events in the bin i produced with the reference PDF set and<br />
index j runs over all the PDF sets, including the reference one.<br />
For the uncertainty applied to the FGH calculation (see section 2.2.1), the reference<br />
cross section was chosen to be the one produced with CTEQ6L proton PDF and AFG04<br />
photon PDF, as exactly this set was used during calculations. Since the chosen PDF set<br />
consistently produces the lowest cross sections in the studied phase space, the resulting<br />
error is highly asymmetric.<br />
The ZL calculation (see section 2.2.2) uses the k ⊥ unintegrated PDF, which could not be<br />
easily applied to the MC. For that purpose, the compromise solution was found, to use<br />
the same PDF uncertainty as evaluated for FGH, but apply it in a symmetric way.<br />
Figure 8.17 presents the PDF uncertainty obtained for the final cross sections, as applied<br />
to the both sets of calculations. The choice of the PDF arises to the leading uncertainty<br />
source in most of the studied phase space being on average slightly below <strong>10</strong>% and reaching<br />
even 15% in some bins of resolved enhanced phase space.<br />
Due to possible cancellations, special attention was taken to ensure correct multiplication<br />
of the different corrections. The ftheor MPI correction, being the first correction applied to the<br />
calculation was determined studying the MC on parton level and with a cone isolation<br />
criteria. The ftheor isol correction was determined with MCs including MPI, but still on parton<br />
level. And finally, for the determination of the third correction, ftheor had , both MCs were<br />
generated with MPI and the cross section phase space was already based on a z variable.<br />
In this way, the final correction factor f theor may be calculated with a reduced formula 7 :<br />
f theor<br />
= f MPI<br />
theor × f isol<br />
theor × f had<br />
= N had,z,MPI<br />
i<br />
theor (8.56)<br />
/N par,cone,∼MPI<br />
i , (8.57)<br />
where N par,cone,∼MPI<br />
i is the number of events in bin i on parton level, with cone based<br />
isolation and without MPI (the phase space directly calculated by the QCD calculations),<br />
while N had,z,MPI<br />
i is the number of events in bin i on hadron level, with z-based isolation<br />
and with MPI (the phase space being the result of the measurement).<br />
All the theory corrections ftheor MPI,<br />
fisol theor , fhad theor , together with their uncertainties and the<br />
PDF uncertainty δ PDF are listed in the relevant tables in appendix C.<br />
7 In practice though, the correction is calculated with an extended triple correction formula, due to<br />
the ftheor had correction determination method, which includes the usage of two different MC generators.