10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
132 Results<br />
9.2 Prompt photon + jet production in photoproduction<br />
The cross section for prompt photon production associated with a jet with a given kinematics<br />
is studied. The measurement is performed in the exclusive phase space, defined in<br />
table 1.4. The measured prompt photon plus jet cross section is<br />
σ(ep → eγ jet X) = 50.1 ± 1.7 (stat) ± 6.5 (syst) pb.<br />
The theoretical calculations predict cross sections of 43.8 +5.3<br />
−1.9<br />
pb (FGH) and 49.3+4.7 −2.1 pb<br />
(LZ). Both are compatible with the measurement within the errors. The MC expectation<br />
of 33.9 pb is again too low.<br />
The differential cross sections in bins of E γ T , ηγ , E jet<br />
T<br />
and η jet in the exclusive prompt<br />
photon + jet phase space are presented in figure 9.3 and tables C-4a, C-5a, C-6a and C-7a.<br />
Both calculations give a reasonable description of the E γ T<br />
and Ejet<br />
T<br />
cross sections while<br />
only the FGH calculation describes η jet of the associated hadronic jet well. Here, the LZ<br />
prediction is too high for jets with η jet < 0.5. As in the inclusive case, the FGH prediction<br />
is too low for η γ < −0.5.<br />
The presence of a jet allows to use observables which give more insight in the underlying<br />
partonic process than in the inclusive case, as defined in section 1.5. Figure 9.4 and<br />
tables C-8a and C-9a show the photon plus jet cross section as a function of the estimators<br />
x LO<br />
γ<br />
and x LO<br />
p<br />
. Both distributions are well described by the calculations.<br />
9.2.1 Photon - jet correlations<br />
Figure 9.5 and tables C-<strong>10</strong>a and C-11a show the cross sections for two observables describing<br />
the transverse correlation between the photon and the jet, p ⊥ and ∆Φ. Both variables<br />
are particularly sensitive to higher order gluon emission. The sample is split into a sample<br />
with x LO<br />
γ > 0.8 where the direct interaction of a photon with the proton dominates and<br />
a sample with x LO<br />
γ < 0.8 with a significant contribution of events with a resolved photon<br />
(see figure 5.7a). Both predictions describe the distributions for x LO<br />
γ > 0.8 reasonably well<br />
but tend to underestimate the tails. For x LO<br />
γ < 0.8 the p ⊥ distribution is slightly broader<br />
than for x LO<br />
γ > 0.8, which reflects the increased contributions from events with a resolved<br />
photon and from photons radiated from quarks in di-jet events. The FGH calculation<br />
poorly describes the p ⊥ distribution but gives a reasonable description of the measurement<br />
in ∆Φ for x LO<br />
γ < 0.8, except for the highest bin in ∆Φ. The region ∆Φ → 180 ◦<br />
is sensitive to multiple soft gluon radiation which limits the validity of fixed order calculations.<br />
The LZ calculation includes multiple soft gluon radiation in the initial state<br />
before the hard subprocess and describes ∆Φ > 170 ◦ but predicts a significantly lower<br />
contribution of events in the tails of both distributions.