10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.2 Event reconstruction 53<br />
4.2 Event reconstruction<br />
Electronic signals collected directly during the data taking are subject to algorithms that<br />
builds more physical objects. <strong>H1</strong> track finding strategy (based on the algorithm described<br />
in [<strong>10</strong>6]) and calorimetry clustering is in details explained in [67]. For an overview of the<br />
primary vertex reconstruction see [<strong>10</strong>7]. On the following pages the scattered electron<br />
identification and jet algorithm is presented.<br />
4.2.1 Scattered electron identification<br />
Two scattered electron finding algorithms are used in this analysis, with one looking for<br />
electron in LAr calorimeter, the second in SPACAL.<br />
The algorithm of scattered electron finding in the LAr calorimeter is based on the QESCAT<br />
finder which main characteristics are described in [<strong>10</strong>8]. The LAr clusters composed of at<br />
least three cells, with energy higher than 5 GeV and transverse momentum higher than<br />
3 GeV are selected. Additional cuts on cluster quality criteria are introduced such as<br />
electromagnetic energy fraction, cluster compactness, radius and isolation. Finally, all<br />
the scattered electron candidates are required to have an associated track with a distance<br />
of closest approach below 12 cm.<br />
In SPACAL all the clusters with electromagnetic energy above 5 GeV and radius below<br />
4 cm are selected. The BPC and BST tracks are used to validate the electron candidate<br />
position, but are not explicitely required.<br />
From the selection of all LAr and SPACAL electron candidates the one with the highest<br />
transverse momentum is selected as the scattered electron and used to veto DIS events<br />
as explained in section 5.1.<br />
4.2.2 Jet algorithm<br />
Due to the confinement effect, partons from hard interaction can not be observed directly.<br />
Instead, during the hadronisation process many colourless secondary particles are created<br />
and leave their signal in the detector. Those final state particles can be grouped back into<br />
jets containing the information about the initial partons produced directly in the collision.<br />
A good jet algorithm should construct objects which well map the parton configuration<br />
and be collinear and infrared safe. Infrared safety means that adding a soft particle into<br />
the final state should not change the jet configuration and is a requirement needed to<br />
minimise the influence of an electronic noise. Collinear safety means that two parallel<br />
particles are exactly equivalent to one particle with the sum of the momenta of the pair.<br />
This requirement accounts for resolution effects of the detector. In this analysis the jet<br />
k T algorithm [<strong>10</strong>9] is used which is both collinear and infrared safe. The algorithm works<br />
as follows:<br />
1. The initial object list is created from all the particle candidates being all the tracks