10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.3 Triggering 57<br />
energetic tracks in the tracker. Subtriggers s82 and s83 were used. The exact definition<br />
for the s82 subtrigger has been changed in the year 2006 from demanding at least 3 tracks<br />
with p T > 400 MeV to at least one track with p T > 900 MeV. The change has been<br />
in charge from run 488289 on. The subtrigger s83 has been additionally verified by L2<br />
topological finder in order to detect D ∗ or di-jet events and was available until run 487915.<br />
Since the statistics of the alternative monitor sample is insufficient for a reliable determination<br />
of the trigger efficiency, the subtrigger s61, based on both SPACAL energy deposition<br />
(including the inner part of the calorimeter) and the tracker, has been included.<br />
Table 4.2 summarises the subtriggers used to determine the efficiency of s67. The overlap<br />
between two samples amounts to 50% of the main monitor sample.<br />
Subtrigger L1 Condition L2/L3 Condition<br />
Monitor<br />
Sample<br />
s0 E IET (outer) > 6 GeV R Spacal > 20 cm<br />
s3 E IET (outer) > 9 GeV R Spacal > 30 cm<br />
s9 E IET (outer) > 2 GeV R Spacal > 30(40) cm<br />
E ET6 > 3 GeV<br />
s82<br />
NTrack 400MeV > 2<br />
−<br />
Alternative<br />
Monitor<br />
Sample<br />
s83<br />
(NTrack 900MeV > 0)<br />
E ET6 > 3 GeV<br />
NTrack 400MeV > 2<br />
D ∗ or di-jet<br />
s61<br />
E IET (all) > 6 GeV<br />
NTrack 900MeV > 0<br />
−<br />
Table 4.2: Subtriggers definitions used for monitoring s67 trigger efficiency.<br />
The trigger efficiency has been evaluated for clusters passing the same cluster selection<br />
as used later in the main selection with the sole exception of the isolation criteria, which<br />
has been skipped altogether. A consistent usage of only highly isolated clusters decreases<br />
the statistics of monitor sample overall by 70% and particularly in forward direction by<br />
85% introducing a high error on fitted trigger efficiency. The possible bias due to missing<br />
isolation criteria has been studied and the results are compatible within statistical errors.<br />
The LAr trigger suffered during the HERA II running period from various localised hardware<br />
problems. In order to restrict the measurement to the well triggered events the<br />
trigger efficiency has been studied as a function of the variable zr defined as<br />
zr =<br />
{<br />
z<br />
r + 300 cm<br />
for CB1, CB2, CB3, FB1, FB2 LAr wheels<br />
for IE1 LAr wheel.<br />
(4.3)