10 - H1 - Desy

8.9 The exclusive photon plus jet total cross sections obtained with five different
unfoldings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
8.10 The E γ T -ηγ distribution of the original MC set I and a MC reweighted
with the f toy
E T ,η
function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
8.11 The discriminator fit performed in bins of E γ T and ηγ for one of the toy
Monte Carlos. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
8.12 The E γ T and ηγ distribution of the toy Mc compared to the results obtained
with the unfolding and fitting procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
8.13 Proton - antiproton collision without and with multiparton interaction. . 122
8.14 Multi parton interaction correction ftheor MPI , together with its uncertainty
as determined for all the final cross sections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
8.15 Isolation correction ftheor isol as determined for all the final cross sections. . . 125
8.16 Hadronisation correction for all the final cross sections. . . . . . . . . . . 126
8.17 Parton density function uncertainty for all the final cross sections. . . . . 128
9.1 The differential inclusive prompt photon cross sections in bins of E γ T and
η γ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
9.2 The double differential inclusive prompt photon cross sections in bins of
E γ T and ηγ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
9.3 The differential exclusive prompt photon + jet cross sections in bins of
E γ T , ηγ , E jet
T and ηjet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
9.4 The differential exclusive prompt photon + jet cross sections in bins of
x LO
γ and x LO
p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
9.5 The differential prompt photon + jet cross sections in bins of ∆Φ and p ⊥
in the direct enhanced phase space and in the resolved enhanced phase
space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
9.6 The NLO correction to the FGH calculation and box diagram cotribution. 137
9.7 The measured cross sections in bins of p ⊥ and ∆Φ in the direct and
resolved enhanced phase space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
9.8 The cross section in bins of p ⊥ and ∆Φ in the direct enhanced phase
space compared to the PYTHIA MC prediction produced with variable
〈k T 〉 value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
9.9 The cross section in bins of p ⊥ (a) and ∆Φ (b) in the direct enhanced
phase space compared to the FGH NLO calculation with different corrections
for the intrinsic transverse momentum effects. The shaded area
indicate the error associated to the original calculation. . . . . . . . . . . 140
9.10 The differential cross sections in bins of E γ T
in the H1 published phase
space (a) and in bins of η γ in the ZEUS published phase space. Both
results are compared to the published ones (drawn with open points). . . 142
1 The signal efficiency versus background rejection graph for all studied
classifiers in the first MVA E T bin and the CB1 wheel. . . . . . . . . . . 152