10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
10 - H1 - Desy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 9<br />
Results<br />
In this chapter results are presented for the production of prompt photons in photoproduction<br />
region based on the data taken by the <strong>H1</strong> detector with an integrated luminosity<br />
of 430 pb −1 . Differential cross sections are compared to QCD calculations and to MC<br />
predictions introduced previously.<br />
The inclusive prompt photon cross sections are shown and discussed in section 9.1. The<br />
differential cross sections in the exclusive photon + jet phase space follow in section 9.2<br />
with special emphasis on the photon - jet correlations. The influence of higher order<br />
corrections is studied in section 9.3. Section 9.5 presents the comparison to the previously<br />
published results in the accordingly adjusted phase space.<br />
9.1 Inclusive prompt photon production in photoproduction<br />
The measured inclusive prompt photon cross section for the kinematic range specified in<br />
table 1.4 is<br />
σ(ep → eγX) = 66.9 ± 1.8 (stat) ± 8.7 (syst) pb.<br />
Both calculations, corrected for all the effects discussed in section 8.7 predict lower cross<br />
sections of 52.1 +5.3<br />
−3.4 pb (FGH) and 56.7+2.3 −3.1 pb (LZ), while the MC expectation from<br />
PYTHIA is 46.4 pb.<br />
Theoretical uncertainties due to missing higher orders are estimated by simultaneously<br />
varying µ R and µ F by a factor of 0.5 to 2.0. In addition, the errors on the theoretical<br />
predictions include all the uncertainties determined in the section 8.7. All error sources<br />
are added in quadrature.<br />
Bin averaged differential cross sections dσ/dE γ T and dσ/dηγ for the inclusive prompt<br />
photon production are given in tables C-1a and C-2a in appendix C and are presented<br />
in the figure 9.1 compared to the prediction from the calculations. Both calculations<br />
are below the data, most significantly at low E γ T<br />
. The LZ calculation gives a reasonable