23.05.2014 Views

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

10 - H1 - Desy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9<br />

Results<br />

In this chapter results are presented for the production of prompt photons in photoproduction<br />

region based on the data taken by the <strong>H1</strong> detector with an integrated luminosity<br />

of 430 pb −1 . Differential cross sections are compared to QCD calculations and to MC<br />

predictions introduced previously.<br />

The inclusive prompt photon cross sections are shown and discussed in section 9.1. The<br />

differential cross sections in the exclusive photon + jet phase space follow in section 9.2<br />

with special emphasis on the photon - jet correlations. The influence of higher order<br />

corrections is studied in section 9.3. Section 9.5 presents the comparison to the previously<br />

published results in the accordingly adjusted phase space.<br />

9.1 Inclusive prompt photon production in photoproduction<br />

The measured inclusive prompt photon cross section for the kinematic range specified in<br />

table 1.4 is<br />

σ(ep → eγX) = 66.9 ± 1.8 (stat) ± 8.7 (syst) pb.<br />

Both calculations, corrected for all the effects discussed in section 8.7 predict lower cross<br />

sections of 52.1 +5.3<br />

−3.4 pb (FGH) and 56.7+2.3 −3.1 pb (LZ), while the MC expectation from<br />

PYTHIA is 46.4 pb.<br />

Theoretical uncertainties due to missing higher orders are estimated by simultaneously<br />

varying µ R and µ F by a factor of 0.5 to 2.0. In addition, the errors on the theoretical<br />

predictions include all the uncertainties determined in the section 8.7. All error sources<br />

are added in quadrature.<br />

Bin averaged differential cross sections dσ/dE γ T and dσ/dηγ for the inclusive prompt<br />

photon production are given in tables C-1a and C-2a in appendix C and are presented<br />

in the figure 9.1 compared to the prediction from the calculations. Both calculations<br />

are below the data, most significantly at low E γ T<br />

. The LZ calculation gives a reasonable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!