29.05.2014 Views

Transportation Spending by Low-Income California Households ...

Transportation Spending by Low-Income California Households ...

Transportation Spending by Low-Income California Households ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vans and Shuttles<br />

Demand-response seems best suited for situations where a group of<br />

people have either the same origin (say, a public housing project) or the<br />

same destination (a large employer or group of employers, a social<br />

services center, a health center, etc.). One option for making<br />

transportation more affordable would be for the employer or agency to<br />

which the individual is traveling to subsidize the shuttle service.<br />

Jitneys<br />

Jitneys combine the characteristics of taxi service, carpooling, and<br />

formal paratransit services. They generally have semi-fixed routes, carry<br />

several passengers at a time, and are much cheaper than taxis. Because<br />

they are often faster and cheaper than public transit as well, jitney<br />

services can take a fair bite out of transit revenues, and transit providers<br />

often show strong opposition to jitney service.<br />

San Francisco once had a thriving jitney fleet, but as Cervero (1997)<br />

reports, “[b]ecause of mounting public transit deficits and pressures to<br />

protect Municipal Railway (Muni) trolleybuses and streetcars from<br />

competition, the city issued no new jitney permits after 1972” (p. 41).<br />

Moreover, after Proposition K passed in 1978, jitney permits were not<br />

allowed to transfer from one operator to another. In addition, increases<br />

in liability insurance requirements and in insurance premiums helped to<br />

shut down the industry. Today, only one jitney service is left in the City<br />

of San Francisco, running between the Montgomery BART station on<br />

Market Street and the Caltrain depot at Fourth and Townsend. 26<br />

Reducing the barriers to operating jitney services would very likely<br />

reduce monetary and time costs for some low-income individuals. An<br />

article in the Harvard Journal on Legislation concludes that,<br />

[J]itneys can contribute invaluably and permanently to efforts to improve<br />

the economic prospects of America’s inner-city residents. Of course, in some<br />

cities, jitneys may be a total flop. Perhaps their remarkable success in New<br />

York and Miami is attributable to the presence of large numbers of immigrants<br />

accustomed to relying on jitneys to serve their transportation needs. However,<br />

the question for legislators ought not to be whether jitneys will in fact<br />

successfully augment the transportation services available to our poorest<br />

_____________<br />

26 San Francisco County <strong>Transportation</strong> Authority (2002).<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!