29.05.2014 Views

Transportation Spending by Low-Income California Households ...

Transportation Spending by Low-Income California Households ...

Transportation Spending by Low-Income California Households ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

advantage to this approach is that it allows us to create similar income<br />

categories across the four datasets, although the income categories are not<br />

exactly the same across the datasets. Some datasets reported only a range<br />

for income, rather than an exact income amount, for example.<br />

The most important difference between datasets in terms of incomegroup<br />

categorization is that we created categories for the Consumer<br />

Expenditure Survey based on expenditure data, whereas for the other<br />

datasets, we used income data because consumption measures are not<br />

available in those datasets. The CES analysis uses expenditures instead of<br />

income for three main reasons:<br />

1. Consumption is a better measure than annual income of<br />

households’ long-term economic resources. 4<br />

2. <strong>Income</strong> data are missing for almost a fifth of the <strong>California</strong> CES<br />

sample; classifying based on expenditures allows us to keep these<br />

households in the analysis. 5<br />

3. For other households, income is not missing but it appears to be<br />

underreported, biasing the expenditure results upward for lowincome<br />

households and downward for other households.<br />

These reasons are discussed further in the CES section of Appendix A.<br />

(In addition, a sensitivity analysis showing how results change when<br />

based on income data is presented in Appendix Table C.1 and discussed<br />

in Appendix C.) The methods used for classifying households into<br />

income categories for each of the four datasets are discussed in more<br />

detail in Appendix A.<br />

_____________<br />

4 From U.S. Census Bureau (2003): “A basic premise of this view is that families<br />

and individuals derive material well-being from the actual consumption of goods and<br />

services rather than from the receipt of income per se; hence, it is appropriate to estimate<br />

their consumption directly. One argument that is often made for preferring<br />

consumption as the resource definition rather than income is that consumption is a better<br />

estimate of families’ long-term or ‘permanent’ income” (p. 3).<br />

5 Because the households that have missing income data have lower total<br />

expenditure levels than the average, dropping households with missing income data from<br />

the analysis would probably eliminate proportionally more low-income households than<br />

higher-income households.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!