19.06.2014 Views

2013/16 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program ... - sacog

2013/16 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program ... - sacog

2013/16 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program ... - sacog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annual Listing of Obligated Projects<br />

By federal requirement, SACOG publishes at the end of each calendar year the Annual Listing of Obligated<br />

Projects 15 , which is a record of project delivery for the previous year. The publication of this list is in<br />

response to 23 U.S.C. 134(j)(7)(B), 23 U.S.C. 135(g)(4)(B), 49 U.S.C. 5303(j)(7)(B), and 49 U.S.C.<br />

5304(g)(4)(B), as revised by SAFETEA-LU, that require “...an Annual Listing of projects, including<br />

investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, for which federal funds have been<br />

obligated in the preceding year shall be published or otherwise made available by the cooperative effort of the<br />

State, transit operator, and metropolitan planning organization for public review. The listing shall be<br />

consistent with the funding categories identified in each metropolitan transportation improvement program<br />

(MTIP).”<br />

The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is intended to increase the awareness of federal government<br />

spending on transportation projects to the public and to indicate a federal project’s progress. However, the<br />

indicator has limitations. When a project reaches a point where federal funds are ready to be expended, a<br />

request is sent from Caltrans to the U.S. Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> requesting commitment of the funds<br />

for reimbursement. (For FTA-funded projects, the obligation equivalent occurs when the FTA grant is<br />

awarded.) This commitment of funds "obligates" the funds, committing the funds to contract for<br />

reimbursement as soon as expenditures occur. This action indicates that the project is proceeding, but the<br />

action can be misleading in several ways. First, obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in<br />

the same year as the obligation year. Second, the amount of the obligation will not necessarily equal the total<br />

cost of the project. Third, it is possible that unused funds may be credited back when not needed at the<br />

completion of a project phase resulting in a negative obligation.<br />

Title VI Compliance<br />

It is SACOG’s policy to comply with state and federal laws and regulations including Title VI of the Civil<br />

Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) <strong>16</strong> and other federal discrimination laws<br />

and regulations, as well as the Unruh Civil Rights Act of 1959 17 , the California Fair Employment and Housing<br />

Act (FEHA) 18 , and other California State discrimination laws and regulations. SACOG does not discriminate<br />

on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, religion, national origin, age, marital status, ancestry, medical condition,<br />

disability, sexual orientation or gender identity in conducting its business. SACOG prohibits discrimination by<br />

its employees, contractors and consultants. 19<br />

Investments made in the MTIP must be consistent with Title VI and must support “Environmental Justice.”<br />

Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, income, and national origin in programs and<br />

activities receiving federal financial assistance. Similarly, Environmental Justice is defined by EPA as “the fair<br />

treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, sex, national origin, or income,<br />

with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and<br />

policies.” Public outreach to and involvement of individuals in low income and minority communities<br />

covered under Title VI, are critical to regional planning and programming decisions. The fundamental<br />

principles of environmental justice include:<br />

• Avoiding, minimizing or mitigating disproportionately high and adverse health or environmental<br />

effects on minority and low-income populations;<br />

• Ensuring full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation<br />

decision-making process; and<br />

• Preventing the denial, reduction or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority populations<br />

and low-income communities.<br />

<strong>2013</strong> MTIP - Page 11 of 390<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!