31.07.2014 Views

Coastal Construction Manual - National Ready Mixed Concrete ...

Coastal Construction Manual - National Ready Mixed Concrete ...

Coastal Construction Manual - National Ready Mixed Concrete ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 SITING<br />

Figure 4‐19.<br />

As buildings in this<br />

Humbolt County,<br />

CA, community are<br />

threatened by bluff<br />

erosion along the<br />

Pacific Ocean, they are<br />

moved to other sites on<br />

the jointly owned parcel<br />

In extreme cases, entire communities have been threatened by erosion and have elected to relocate. For<br />

example, the village of Shishmaref, AK, voted in November 1998 to relocate their community of 600 after<br />

storm erosion threatened several houses and after previous shore protection efforts failed.<br />

More information on specific examples of relocation of threatened buildings can be found in FEMA 257,<br />

Mitigation of Flood and Erosion Damage to Residential Buildings in <strong>Coastal</strong> Areas (FEMA 1994). The report<br />

also presents several examples of flood and erosion mitigation through other measures (e.g., elevation,<br />

foundation alterations).<br />

4.5.3 Lot Configurations near Tidal Inlets, Bay Entrances, and River Mouths<br />

Layout of lots and infrastructure along shorelines near<br />

tidal inlets, bay entrances, and river mouths is especially<br />

problematic. The three South Carolina houses in Figure<br />

4-20 were built between January 1995 and January 1996,<br />

approximately 2 years before the photograph was taken in<br />

July 1997. They were built 100 or more feet landward of the<br />

vegetation line, but rapid erosion associated with a nearby tidal<br />

inlet left the houses standing on the beach only two years after<br />

construction. The shoreline will probably return to its former<br />

location, taking several years to do so. Although the buildings<br />

are structurally intact, their siting can be considered a failure.<br />

CROSS REFERENCE<br />

Section 3.5 also describes<br />

instances where the subdivision<br />

and development of oceanfront<br />

parcels near ocean-bay<br />

connections led to buildings<br />

being threatened by inlet-caused<br />

erosion.<br />

Figure 4-21 shows condominiums built adjacent to the shore in Havre de Grace, MD, where the mouth of<br />

the Susquehanna River meets the head of the Chesapeake Bay. Although the buildings are elevated, they<br />

are subject to storm surge and flood-borne debris. Infrastructure development and lot layout in similar<br />

cases should be preceded by a detailed study of historical shoreline changes, including development of (at<br />

least) a conceptual model of shoreline changes. Potential future shoreline positions should be projected, and<br />

development should be sited sufficiently landward of any areas of persistent or cyclic shoreline erosion.<br />

4-22 COASTAL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!