Coastal Construction Manual - National Ready Mixed Concrete ...
Coastal Construction Manual - National Ready Mixed Concrete ...
Coastal Construction Manual - National Ready Mixed Concrete ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 SITING<br />
Figure 4‐19.<br />
As buildings in this<br />
Humbolt County,<br />
CA, community are<br />
threatened by bluff<br />
erosion along the<br />
Pacific Ocean, they are<br />
moved to other sites on<br />
the jointly owned parcel<br />
In extreme cases, entire communities have been threatened by erosion and have elected to relocate. For<br />
example, the village of Shishmaref, AK, voted in November 1998 to relocate their community of 600 after<br />
storm erosion threatened several houses and after previous shore protection efforts failed.<br />
More information on specific examples of relocation of threatened buildings can be found in FEMA 257,<br />
Mitigation of Flood and Erosion Damage to Residential Buildings in <strong>Coastal</strong> Areas (FEMA 1994). The report<br />
also presents several examples of flood and erosion mitigation through other measures (e.g., elevation,<br />
foundation alterations).<br />
4.5.3 Lot Configurations near Tidal Inlets, Bay Entrances, and River Mouths<br />
Layout of lots and infrastructure along shorelines near<br />
tidal inlets, bay entrances, and river mouths is especially<br />
problematic. The three South Carolina houses in Figure<br />
4-20 were built between January 1995 and January 1996,<br />
approximately 2 years before the photograph was taken in<br />
July 1997. They were built 100 or more feet landward of the<br />
vegetation line, but rapid erosion associated with a nearby tidal<br />
inlet left the houses standing on the beach only two years after<br />
construction. The shoreline will probably return to its former<br />
location, taking several years to do so. Although the buildings<br />
are structurally intact, their siting can be considered a failure.<br />
CROSS REFERENCE<br />
Section 3.5 also describes<br />
instances where the subdivision<br />
and development of oceanfront<br />
parcels near ocean-bay<br />
connections led to buildings<br />
being threatened by inlet-caused<br />
erosion.<br />
Figure 4-21 shows condominiums built adjacent to the shore in Havre de Grace, MD, where the mouth of<br />
the Susquehanna River meets the head of the Chesapeake Bay. Although the buildings are elevated, they<br />
are subject to storm surge and flood-borne debris. Infrastructure development and lot layout in similar<br />
cases should be preceded by a detailed study of historical shoreline changes, including development of (at<br />
least) a conceptual model of shoreline changes. Potential future shoreline positions should be projected, and<br />
development should be sited sufficiently landward of any areas of persistent or cyclic shoreline erosion.<br />
4-22 COASTAL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL