02.09.2014 Views

Experimental Study of Biodegradation of Ethanol and Toluene Vapors

Experimental Study of Biodegradation of Ethanol and Toluene Vapors

Experimental Study of Biodegradation of Ethanol and Toluene Vapors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.4.3 <strong>Toluene</strong>-ethanol Bioremediation<br />

For this set <strong>of</strong> experiments, the aqueous nutrients were added to the bioreactor at<br />

150 mL/h (dilution rate <strong>of</strong> 0.1 h -1 ), ethanol was introduced through an air stream at an<br />

inlet concentration <strong>of</strong> 15.9 mg/L <strong>and</strong> at an air flow rate <strong>of</strong> 0.4 L/min (loading <strong>of</strong> 254<br />

mg/L-h, see Figure 4-15). Figure 4-15 shows a continuation <strong>of</strong> a previous operation.<br />

When the operation reached steady state, toluene was introduced into the bioreactor at<br />

an air inlet concentration <strong>of</strong> 4.5 mg/L (loading <strong>of</strong> 72 mg/L-h, total loading <strong>of</strong> 326 mg/Lh).<br />

<strong>Ethanol</strong> removal efficiency remained at 100% <strong>and</strong> toluene removal efficiency<br />

reached 89% at steady state conditions. The liquid concentrations <strong>of</strong> toluene <strong>and</strong> benzyl<br />

alcohol were below 10 <strong>and</strong> 70 mg/L (results are not presented in the Figure 4-15),<br />

respectively. After maintaining steady state conditions for 20 hours, the toluene inlet<br />

concentration was increased to 5.8 mg/L while the ethanol inlet concentration was<br />

maintained at 15.9 mg/L <strong>and</strong> the air flow rate was maintained at 0.4 L/min (toluene<br />

loading <strong>of</strong> 93 mg/L-h, total loading <strong>of</strong> 347 mg/L-h). Over the next 20 hours, toluene<br />

concentration in the outlet air stream increased almost three-fold <strong>and</strong> reached 1.2 mg/L<br />

which represented a gas removal efficiency <strong>of</strong> 79 % (See Figure 4-16). However, the<br />

liquid phase ethanol concentration increased to 0.47 g/L <strong>and</strong> the benzyl alcohol<br />

concentration steadily climbed to 0.12 g/L. This was due to oxygen depletion since<br />

dissolved oxygen reading fell to zero. This will be further discussed in Section 5.6.<br />

Since ethanol is volatile <strong>and</strong> therefore difficult to supply as a co-substrate, benzyl<br />

alcohol was next introduced in the liquid feed as another potential co-substrate.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!