A Review of FBI Security Programs
A Review of FBI Security Programs
A Review of FBI Security Programs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Security</strong> programs are not given high priority during inspections, which evaluate<br />
compliance with goals set in the Annual Field Office Report each <strong>of</strong>fice develops. <strong>Security</strong><br />
is not a component <strong>of</strong> the report. As a result, security inspections are usually completed in<br />
a day or less and are <strong>of</strong>ten scheduled during the last week or day <strong>of</strong> the review. Special<br />
Agents-in-Charge (SACs) are not evaluated on the basis <strong>of</strong> compliance with security<br />
programs. Field <strong>Security</strong> Officers and the SACs to whom they report do not respect security<br />
inspections because there are no significant consequences for noncompliance. Some <strong>Security</strong><br />
Officers assert that SACs have requested that they accept criticisms <strong>of</strong> security issues during<br />
these inspections, in lieu <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice receiving negative findings on critical programs<br />
included in the Annual Field Office Report.<br />
The Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>Security</strong> should periodically review security programs and systems in<br />
Headquarters and the field, independent <strong>of</strong> reviews conducted by the Inspection Division.<br />
Teams <strong>of</strong> security specialists from the Office, as well as security experts from field <strong>of</strong>fices,<br />
should initially focus on <strong>of</strong>fices with documented security concerns or high security risks.<br />
The on-site review should be comprehensive. The Office should be given authority to rate<br />
security programs and their management, and the rating should be a critical element in SAC<br />
performance appraisals. Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>Security</strong> personnel should also be detailed to the<br />
Inspection Division as needed to ensure meaningful audits <strong>of</strong> security programs.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Because Bureau security functions are dispersed across eight Headquarters divisions<br />
and many field <strong>of</strong>fices, no one has traditionally been responsible for developing,<br />
implementing, and enforcing consistent security policy and practices.<br />
Because the Bureau has failed to designate security as a core function, management<br />
continues to slight the security program in favor <strong>of</strong> operational functions and to deny security<br />
programs the resources needed to succeed.<br />
The key to effective security programs within the <strong>FBI</strong> is an adequately funded Office<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Security</strong>, reporting to the Director and responsible for security policy, implementation,<br />
-105-