title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University
title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University
title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 5<br />
Conclusions and Recommendations<br />
5.1 Summary<br />
The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to examine <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> structures in <strong>the</strong> Creighton<br />
Deep and mining-induced seismicity. This was accomplished through geological investigations,<br />
seismic analysis and numerical modelling <strong>of</strong> stress.<br />
Geological investigations identified four principal systems <strong>of</strong> structures: <strong>the</strong> Footwall Shear Zone,<br />
E–W-striking shear zones, SW-striking shear zones (<strong>the</strong> 118 System) and splays between SWstriking<br />
shear zones. Numerical stress modelling demonstrates that <strong>the</strong>se structures constitute<br />
weak zones within <strong>the</strong> rock mass and underground investigations indicate that such structures are<br />
healed. The Footwall Shear Zone and 1290 Shear Zone are laterally and vertically continuous but<br />
have little impact on stress or seismicity. SW-striking shear zones do not have a consistent<br />
composition and <strong>of</strong>ten do not correlate level-to-level. Small displacements were noted along<br />
younger fractures that cross-cut shear zones and foliation ra<strong>the</strong>r than along <strong>the</strong> shear zones<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves, fur<strong>the</strong>r suggesting that shear zones are healed.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> seismic events within <strong>the</strong> Creighton Deep did not reveal a relationship between<br />
structure and seismicity. Microseismic events do not spatially correspond to <strong>the</strong> mapped fault<br />
geometry. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, analysis <strong>of</strong> seismic event parameters does not reveal any spatial<br />
correlation to shear zones but does reveal areas <strong>of</strong> preferred seismic activity. Focal mechanisms<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se microseismic events do not indicate any spatial correlation with structure. Consistency in<br />
focal plane solution axes for microseismic events, however, suggests that slip occurs on<br />
106