title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Fayek & Kyser 2000 uraninite fractionations.pdf - Queen's University$

142 Energy 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 04/01/2006 04/02/2006 04/03/2006 04/04/2006 04/05/2006 04/06/2006 04/07/2006 04/08/2006 04/09/2006 04/10/2006 04/11/2006 04/12/2006 04/01/2007 04/02/2007 04/03/2007 04/04/2007 04/05/2007 04/06/2007 04/07/2007 04/08/2007 04/09/2007 04/10/2007 04/11/2007 04/12/2007 Apparent Stress 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 04/01/2006 04/02/2006 04/03/2006 04/04/2006 04/05/2006 04/06/2006 04/07/2006 04/08/2006 04/09/2006 04/10/2006 04/11/2006 04/12/2006 04/01/2007 04/02/2007 04/03/2007 04/04/2007 04/05/2007 04/06/2007 04/07/2007 04/08/2007 04/09/2007 04/10/2007 04/11/2007 04/12/2007 Dynamic Stress Drop 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 04/01/2006 04/02/2006 04/03/2006 04/04/2006 04/05/2006 04/06/2006 04/07/2006 04/08/2006 04/09/2006 04/10/2006 04/11/2006 04/12/2006 04/01/2007 04/02/2007 04/03/2007 04/04/2007 04/05/2007 04/06/2007 04/07/2007 04/08/2007 04/09/2007 04/10/2007 04/11/2007 04/12/2007
143 Peak Velocity Parameter -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 04/01/2006 04/03/2006 04/05/2006 04/07/2006 04/09/2006 04/11/2006 04/01/2007 04/03/2007 04/05/2007 04/07/2007 04/09/2007 04/11/2007 Es/Ep 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 04/01/2006 04/03/2006 04/05/2006 04/07/2006 04/09/2006 04/11/2006 04/01/2007 04/03/2007 04/05/2007 04/07/2007 04/09/2007 04/11/2007 Source Radius 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 04/01/2006 04/02/2006 04/03/2006 04/04/2006 04/05/2006 04/06/2006 04/07/2006 04/08/2006 04/09/2006 04/10/2006 04/11/2006 04/12/2006 04/01/2007 04/02/2007 04/03/2007 04/04/2007 04/05/2007 04/06/2007 04/07/2007 04/08/2007 04/09/2007 04/10/2007 04/11/2007 04/12/2007
Page 1 and 2:
THE INFLUENCES OF STRESS AND STRUCT
Page 3 and 4:
esulting in increased stress to the
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Abstract.........
Page 7 and 8:
4.6.1 Fracture Reactivation........
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure 1.1: Locatio
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3.23: Preliminary stress inv
Page 13 and 14:
Figure B11: Events between Jan 1, 2
Page 15 and 16:
List of Tables Table 2.1: Geologica
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Backgrou
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 1.1: Location of Sudbury and
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 Geological Assessment of
Page 23 and 24:
ack breccia and sediments later dep
Page 25 and 26:
Murray Fault, the principal fault o
Page 27 and 28:
2.2 Local Geology of Creighton Mine
Page 29 and 30:
B West East B’ Figure 2.4B: Longi
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2.2: Fault systems within the
Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.3: Summary of Fault Charact
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.6: (A) Damage to shotcrete
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2.7: (A) The 1290 Shear Zone
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2.8: Images of (A) the 400-E
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.9: (A) Photograph of the c
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2.10 (A) Shear foliation, in
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2.11: Thin sections of the F
Page 47 and 48:
(Fig. 2.12B). Reduction of quartz g
Page 49 and 50:
2.3.11 Late-Stage Fractures The you
Page 51 and 52:
overprinting (Cochrane, 1991; Couls
Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.4: Summary of Proterozoic t
Page 55 and 56:
Both of these inferred stress direc
Page 57 and 58:
are, at this time, in the process o
Page 59 and 60:
Microseismic events of this subset
Page 61 and 62:
3.2.1.2 Seismic Energy (E o ) and S
Page 63 and 64:
3.2.1.4 Stress Parameters Stress pa
Page 65 and 66:
located events were removed from cl
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 3.7: Detected seismicity cor
Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.1: Event characteristics in
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3.3: Summary of relevant para
Page 73 and 74:
) Damage Zone The rock mass in the
Page 75 and 76:
quadrants of dilatation and compres
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3.12: Lower hemisphere equal
Page 79 and 80:
mechanism shows that over 57% of th
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 3.16: Classification of prin
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.18: Contoured P-axis, B-ax
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 3.20: Distribution of double
Page 87 and 88:
This parameter reflects the magnitu
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3.23: Preliminary stress inv
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3.25: Equal area stereonet s
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3.27: (A) Maximum principal
Page 95 and 96:
4.2 Numerical Methods Phase 2 and U
Page 97 and 98:
Stress-strain relationships are use
Page 99 and 100:
Rock mass failure is governed by th
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 4.5: (A) Model for tectonic
Page 103 and 104:
The zero cohesion and low friction
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 4.9: Model of yielding for C
Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.11: Model of differential
Page 109 and 110: Figure 4.14: Model of maximum stres
Page 111 and 112: stress field model. There is little
Page 113 and 114: clustering are indications of rock
Page 115 and 116: Figure 4.23: Contoured domains of s
Page 117 and 118: Figure 4.24: Fracture initiation th
Page 119 and 120: seismic Cluster 1, which correspond
Page 121 and 122: contains energetic events and is no
Page 123 and 124: preferentially oriented fracture pl
Page 125 and 126: methodologies employed are of value
Page 127 and 128: References Alcott, J. M., Kaiser, P
Page 129 and 130: Galkin, V., Mungall, J. (2005). Str
Page 131 and 132: Mungall, J. E., & Hanley, J. J. (20
Page 133 and 134: Appendix A Geological Maps and Samp
Page 135 and 136: A.2 Level Plans with Sample Locatio
Page 137 and 138: Figure A3: 7400 Level, modified for
Page 139 and 140: Figure A5: 7680 Level, modified for
Page 141 and 142: Figure A7: 7940 Ramp, modified from
Page 143 and 144: MICROSEISMIC EVENTS Source Radius A
Page 145 and 146: 2006 Event Frequency with Depth 600
Page 147 and 148: B.2 Spatial Distribution of Seismic
Page 149 and 150: Figure B11: Events between Jan 1, 2
Page 155 and 156: Cluster 1 Source Radius Asp. Radius
Page 157: Seismic Moment 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0
Page 161 and 162: B.4.2 Temporal Distribution of Clus
Page 163 and 164: 147 Static Stress Drop 5.0 5.5 6.0
Page 165 and 166: B.4.3 Temporal Distribution of Clus
Page 167 and 168: 151 Static Stress Drop 4.0 4.5 5.0
Page 169 and 170: Frequency-Magnitude Relation for Cl
Page 171 and 172: P-axis B-axis T-axis 155 Fault Plan
Page 173 and 174: P-axis B-axis T-axis Fault Plane 1
Page 179 and 180: D.1.1: Case 1 Models Figure D1: Cas
Page 181 and 182: Figure D3: Case 1, elastic models s
Page 183 and 184: A B C D Figure D5: Case 1, plastic
Page 185 and 186: A B C D Figure D7: Case 1, plastic
Page 187 and 188: D.1.2: Case 2 Models A B C D Figure
Page 189 and 190: D.1.3: Case 3 Models A B C Figure D
Page 191 and 192: D1.4 Tectonic Loading Models Figure
Page 193 and 194: D.2 Discussion of Phase 2 Models El
Page 195 and 196: Staged models were created in which
Page 197 and 198: Figure D17 (A) Elastic model showin
Page 199 and 200: Figure D19 (A) Elastic model showin
Page 201 and 202: • Similar damage zones surroundin
Page 203 and 204: ; ;================================
Page 205 and 206: change jmat=1 range 0,1564.64 0,156
Page 207 and 208: crack (845.579,718.676) (787.063,57
Page 209 and 210:
;===plum=== crack (0,355.2371429) (
Page 211 and 212:
crack (866.14,726.44) (838.2,737.61
Page 213 and 214:
crack (838.2,737.616) (815.848,771.
Page 215 and 216:
crack (815.848,771.144) (815.848,78
Page 217 and 218:
;===== define sub block ===========
Page 219 and 220:
E.9 S3:S1 Model for fracture reacti
Page 221 and 222:
yval= abs(z_syy(zi)) xyval= abs(z_s
Page 223 and 224:
and rearranged to , (Equation F4) .
Page 225:
Such that , (Equation F19) I is the
show all

title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?