- Page 1 and 2:
THE INFLUENCES OF STRESS AND STRUCT
- Page 3 and 4:
esulting in increased stress to the
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Abstract.........
- Page 7 and 8:
4.6.1 Fracture Reactivation........
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure 1.1: Locatio
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3.23: Preliminary stress inv
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure B11: Events between Jan 1, 2
- Page 15 and 16:
List of Tables Table 2.1: Geologica
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Backgrou
- Page 19 and 20:
Figure 1.1: Location of Sudbury and
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 Geological Assessment of
- Page 23 and 24:
ack breccia and sediments later dep
- Page 25 and 26:
Murray Fault, the principal fault o
- Page 27 and 28:
2.2 Local Geology of Creighton Mine
- Page 29 and 30:
B West East B’ Figure 2.4B: Longi
- Page 31 and 32:
Table 2.2: Fault systems within the
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.3: Summary of Fault Charact
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.6: (A) Damage to shotcrete
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2.7: (A) The 1290 Shear Zone
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2.8: Images of (A) the 400-E
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.9: (A) Photograph of the c
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2.10 (A) Shear foliation, in
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 2.11: Thin sections of the F
- Page 47 and 48: (Fig. 2.12B). Reduction of quartz g
- Page 49 and 50: 2.3.11 Late-Stage Fractures The you
- Page 51 and 52: overprinting (Cochrane, 1991; Couls
- Page 53 and 54: Table 2.4: Summary of Proterozoic t
- Page 55 and 56: Both of these inferred stress direc
- Page 57 and 58: are, at this time, in the process o
- Page 59 and 60: Microseismic events of this subset
- Page 61 and 62: 3.2.1.2 Seismic Energy (E o ) and S
- Page 63 and 64: 3.2.1.4 Stress Parameters Stress pa
- Page 65 and 66: located events were removed from cl
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 3.7: Detected seismicity cor
- Page 69 and 70: Table 3.1: Event characteristics in
- Page 71 and 72: Table 3.3: Summary of relevant para
- Page 73 and 74: ) Damage Zone The rock mass in the
- Page 75 and 76: quadrants of dilatation and compres
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 3.12: Lower hemisphere equal
- Page 79 and 80: mechanism shows that over 57% of th
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 3.16: Classification of prin
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 3.18: Contoured P-axis, B-ax
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 3.20: Distribution of double
- Page 87 and 88: This parameter reflects the magnitu
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 3.23: Preliminary stress inv
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3.25: Equal area stereonet s
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 3.27: (A) Maximum principal
- Page 95: 4.2 Numerical Methods Phase 2 and U
- Page 99 and 100: Rock mass failure is governed by th
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 4.5: (A) Model for tectonic
- Page 103 and 104: The zero cohesion and low friction
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 4.9: Model of yielding for C
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.11: Model of differential
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 4.14: Model of maximum stres
- Page 111 and 112: stress field model. There is little
- Page 113 and 114: clustering are indications of rock
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 4.23: Contoured domains of s
- Page 117 and 118: Figure 4.24: Fracture initiation th
- Page 119 and 120: seismic Cluster 1, which correspond
- Page 121 and 122: contains energetic events and is no
- Page 123 and 124: preferentially oriented fracture pl
- Page 125 and 126: methodologies employed are of value
- Page 127 and 128: References Alcott, J. M., Kaiser, P
- Page 129 and 130: Galkin, V., Mungall, J. (2005). Str
- Page 131 and 132: Mungall, J. E., & Hanley, J. J. (20
- Page 133 and 134: Appendix A Geological Maps and Samp
- Page 135 and 136: A.2 Level Plans with Sample Locatio
- Page 137 and 138: Figure A3: 7400 Level, modified for
- Page 139 and 140: Figure A5: 7680 Level, modified for
- Page 141 and 142: Figure A7: 7940 Ramp, modified from
- Page 143 and 144: MICROSEISMIC EVENTS Source Radius A
- Page 145 and 146: 2006 Event Frequency with Depth 600
- Page 147 and 148:
B.2 Spatial Distribution of Seismic
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure B11: Events between Jan 1, 2
- Page 151 and 152:
Figure B15: Events between Jan 1, 2
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure B19: Events between Jan 1, 2
- Page 155 and 156:
Cluster 1 Source Radius Asp. Radius
- Page 157 and 158:
Seismic Moment 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0
- Page 159 and 160:
143 Peak Velocity Parameter -2.5 -2
- Page 161 and 162:
B.4.2 Temporal Distribution of Clus
- Page 163 and 164:
147 Static Stress Drop 5.0 5.5 6.0
- Page 165 and 166:
B.4.3 Temporal Distribution of Clus
- Page 167 and 168:
151 Static Stress Drop 4.0 4.5 5.0
- Page 169 and 170:
Frequency-Magnitude Relation for Cl
- Page 171 and 172:
P-axis B-axis T-axis 155 Fault Plan
- Page 173 and 174:
P-axis B-axis T-axis Fault Plane 1
- Page 175 and 176:
P-axis B-axis T-axis Fault Plane 1
- Page 177 and 178:
P-axis B-axis T-axis Fault Plane 1
- Page 179 and 180:
D.1.1: Case 1 Models Figure D1: Cas
- Page 181 and 182:
Figure D3: Case 1, elastic models s
- Page 183 and 184:
A B C D Figure D5: Case 1, plastic
- Page 185 and 186:
A B C D Figure D7: Case 1, plastic
- Page 187 and 188:
D.1.2: Case 2 Models A B C D Figure
- Page 189 and 190:
D.1.3: Case 3 Models A B C Figure D
- Page 191 and 192:
D1.4 Tectonic Loading Models Figure
- Page 193 and 194:
D.2 Discussion of Phase 2 Models El
- Page 195 and 196:
Staged models were created in which
- Page 197 and 198:
Figure D17 (A) Elastic model showin
- Page 199 and 200:
Figure D19 (A) Elastic model showin
- Page 201 and 202:
• Similar damage zones surroundin
- Page 203 and 204:
; ;================================
- Page 205 and 206:
change jmat=1 range 0,1564.64 0,156
- Page 207 and 208:
crack (845.579,718.676) (787.063,57
- Page 209 and 210:
;===plum=== crack (0,355.2371429) (
- Page 211 and 212:
crack (866.14,726.44) (838.2,737.61
- Page 213 and 214:
crack (838.2,737.616) (815.848,771.
- Page 215 and 216:
crack (815.848,771.144) (815.848,78
- Page 217 and 218:
;===== define sub block ===========
- Page 219 and 220:
E.9 S3:S1 Model for fracture reacti
- Page 221 and 222:
yval= abs(z_syy(zi)) xyval= abs(z_s
- Page 223 and 224:
and rearranged to , (Equation F4) .
- Page 225:
Such that , (Equation F19) I is the