title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Fayek & Kyser 2000 uraninite fractionations.pdf - Queen's University$

B.3 Cluster Statistics Table B2: Summary Statistics for microseismic event clusters about <strong>the</strong> 7400 Level with location errors less than 30 feet. Cluster 1 Error Ns Nu uMag Nt tMag Mom. Mag. LOG M LOG E Es/Ep Mean 17.06 21.89 15.57 -2.67 6.32 -1.61 -1.11 7.79 3.28 8.89 Standard Error 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.20 Median 17.00 22.00 16.00 -2.70 6.00 -1.70 -1.20 7.67 3.20 7.70 Mode 18.00 24.00 17.00 -2.80 6.00 -2.00 -1.20 7.49 3.11 6.30 Standard Dev. 4.01 3.72 3.26 0.48 1.11 0.50 0.30 0.57 0.97 5.04 Sample Variance 16.10 13.81 10.63 0.23 1.22 0.25 0.09 0.32 0.94 25.36 Kurtosis 0.13 0.06 0.13 0.47 -0.45 1.20 2.01 1.29 0.74 29.63 Skewness 0.54 -0.39 -0.34 0.54 -0.27 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.49 3.85 Range 21.00 22.00 20.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 3.74 6.34 62.30 Minimum 9.00 9.00 5.00 -3.90 3.00 -2.70 -1.90 6.19 0.37 2.60 Maximum 30.00 31.00 25.00 -0.90 8.00 0.30 0.10 9.93 6.71 64.90 Count 619 619 619 619 619 619 619 619 619 619 Cluster 2 Error Ns Nu uMag Nt tMag Mom. Mag. LOG M LOG E Es/Ep Mean 15.88 22.96 15.04 -2.92 6.46 -2.04 -1.28 7.37 1.73 7.52 Standard Error 0.21 0.30 0.18 0.03 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.28 Median 15.00 23.00 15.00 -3.00 7.00 -2.20 -1.30 7.26 1.58 6.70 Mode 16.00 19.00 17.00 -2.80 8.00 -2.40 -1.50 7.23 1.38 4.70 Standard Dev. 3.67 5.19 3.05 0.48 1.39 0.62 0.32 0.57 1.18 4.83 Sample Variance 13.45 26.95 9.33 0.23 1.95 0.39 0.10 0.33 1.40 23.30 Kurtosis 1.83 -0.38 0.26 1.20 -0.70 0.05 1.23 1.14 -0.34 120.14 Skewness 1.11 0.09 -0.29 0.79 -0.50 0.78 0.75 0.73 0.55 9.00 Range 21.00 27.00 18.00 3.30 5.00 3.10 1.90 3.47 5.21 71.40 Minimum 9.00 10.00 5.00 -4.10 3.00 -3.10 -2.10 5.85 -0.19 2.40 Maximum 30.00 37.00 23.00 -0.80 8.00 0.00 -0.20 9.32 5.02 73.80 Count 297 297 297 297 297 297 297 297 297 297 Cluster 3 Error Ns Nu uMag Nt tMag 138 Mom. Mag. LOG M LOG E Es/Ep Mean 14.78 21.55 14.13 -3.10 5.84 -2.22 -1.37 7.23 1.31 9.42 Standard Error 0.24 0.38 0.22 0.03 0.10 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.32 Median 15.00 20.50 14.00 -3.10 6.00 -2.35 -1.40 7.12 0.98 8.60 Mode 15.00 20.00 14.00 -3.10 5.00 -2.80 -1.50 7.01 0.31 8.60 Standard Dev. 3.60 5.67 3.29 0.49 1.44 0.65 0.38 0.68 1.22 4.72 Sample Variance 12.97 32.19 10.83 0.24 2.06 0.42 0.14 0.46 1.48 22.24 Kurtosis 0.75 -0.29 -0.30 -0.22 -0.43 0.71 2.34 1.11 0.40 19.43 Skewness 0.46 0.52 -0.16 0.24 -0.22 0.97 0.84 0.68 0.94 3.24 Range 22.00 28.00 17.00 2.60 6.00 3.70 2.40 3.94 6.13 44.30 Minimum 6.00 9.00 5.00 -4.20 2.00 -3.50 -2.20 5.73 -0.57 2.00 Maximum 28.00 37.00 22.00 -1.60 8.00 0.20 0.20 9.67 5.56 46.30 Count 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220
Cluster 1 Source Radius Asp. Radius LOG Static SD LOG App. Stress LOG Dynamic SD. LOG Max. Displ. LOG Peak Vel. LOG Peak Acc. Mean 2.10 0.60 6.84 6.05 7.12 -3.56 -1.36 6.02 Standard Error 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Median 2.12 0.57 6.85 6.09 7.09 -3.59 -1.39 5.99 Mode 2.03 0.53 7.01 6.24 7.01 -3.92 -1.72 5.98 Standard Deviation 0.56 0.18 0.37 0.50 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.40 Sample Variance 0.31 0.03 0.14 0.25 0.16 0.21 0.21 0.16 Kurtosis 0.49 2.94 0.67 1.35 0.25 0.68 0.69 0.24 Skewness -0.32 1.40 -0.28 -0.57 0.57 0.67 0.67 0.57 Range 3.14 1.23 2.47 3.71 2.28 2.81 2.81 2.28 Minimum 0.73 0.30 5.39 3.79 6.19 -4.67 -2.47 5.09 Maximum 3.87 1.53 7.86 7.51 8.47 -1.87 0.34 7.37 Count 619 619 619 619 619 619 619 619 Cluster 2 Source Radius Asp. Radius LOG Static SD LOG App. Stress LOG Dynamic SD. LOG Max. Displ. LOG Peak Vel. LOG Peak Acc. Mean 2.24 0.59 6.11 4.92 6.50 -4.21 -2.01 5.40 Standard Error 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 Median 2.34 0.55 6.14 4.93 6.43 -4.30 -2.10 5.33 Mode 1.99 0.45 6.14 4.50 6.12 -4.45 -1.97 5.02 Standard Deviation 0.68 0.19 0.53 0.73 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.40 Sample Variance 0.46 0.04 0.29 0.53 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 Kurtosis -0.23 1.02 -0.45 -0.79 -0.13 -0.11 -0.11 -0.13 Skewness -0.60 1.00 0.08 -0.03 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.65 Range 3.19 1.13 2.83 3.39 1.99 2.29 2.29 1.99 Minimum 0.70 0.25 5.05 3.52 5.82 -5.03 -2.83 4.72 Maximum 3.89 1.38 7.88 6.91 7.80 -2.74 -0.53 6.70 Count 297 297 297 297 297 297 297 297 Cluster 3 Source Radius Asp. Radius LOG Static SD LOG App. Stress LOG Dynamic SD. LOG Max. Displ. LOG Peak Vel. LOG Peak Acc. Mean 2.55 0.49 5.86 4.64 6.49 -4.30 -2.09 5.39 Standard Error 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 Median 2.66 0.45 5.84 4.58 6.40 -4.46 -2.26 5.30 Mode 2.46 0.38 5.35 5.31 6.10 -4.53 -2.47 5.00 Standard Dev. 1.03 0.16 0.63 0.76 0.42 0.53 0.53 0.42 Sample Variance 1.06 0.03 0.39 0.58 0.18 0.28 0.28 0.18 Kurtosis -0.74 3.23 -0.83 -0.93 -0.07 0.15 0.15 -0.08 Skewness -0.35 1.54 0.18 0.22 0.71 0.86 0.86 0.71 Range 3.96 0.95 2.70 3.37 2.15 2.68 2.68 2.15 Minimum 0.66 0.26 4.66 3.08 5.66 -5.28 -3.07 4.56 Maximum 4.62 1.21 7.36 6.45 7.81 -2.60 -0.39 6.71 Count 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 139
Page 1 and 2:
THE INFLUENCES OF STRESS AND STRUCT
Page 3 and 4:
esulting in increased stress to the
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Abstract.........
Page 7 and 8:
4.6.1 Fracture Reactivation........
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure 1.1: Locatio
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3.23: Preliminary stress inv
Page 13 and 14:
Figure B11: Events between Jan 1, 2
Page 15 and 16:
List of Tables Table 2.1: Geologica
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Backgrou
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 1.1: Location of Sudbury and
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 Geological Assessment of
Page 23 and 24:
ack breccia and sediments later dep
Page 25 and 26:
Murray Fault, the principal fault o
Page 27 and 28:
2.2 Local Geology of Creighton Mine
Page 29 and 30:
B West East B’ Figure 2.4B: Longi
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2.2: Fault systems within the
Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.3: Summary of Fault Charact
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.6: (A) Damage to shotcrete
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2.7: (A) The 1290 Shear Zone
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2.8: Images of (A) the 400-E
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.9: (A) Photograph of the c
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2.10 (A) Shear foliation, in
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2.11: Thin sections of the F
Page 47 and 48:
(Fig. 2.12B). Reduction of quartz g
Page 49 and 50:
2.3.11 Late-Stage Fractures The you
Page 51 and 52:
overprinting (Cochrane, 1991; Couls
Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.4: Summary of Proterozoic t
Page 55 and 56:
Both of these inferred stress direc
Page 57 and 58:
are, at this time, in the process o
Page 59 and 60:
Microseismic events of this subset
Page 61 and 62:
3.2.1.2 Seismic Energy (E o ) and S
Page 63 and 64:
3.2.1.4 Stress Parameters Stress pa
Page 65 and 66:
located events were removed from cl
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 3.7: Detected seismicity cor
Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.1: Event characteristics in
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3.3: Summary of relevant para
Page 73 and 74:
) Damage Zone The rock mass in the
Page 75 and 76:
quadrants of dilatation and compres
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3.12: Lower hemisphere equal
Page 79 and 80:
mechanism shows that over 57% of th
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 3.16: Classification of prin
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.18: Contoured P-axis, B-ax
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 3.20: Distribution of double
Page 87 and 88:
This parameter reflects the magnitu
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3.23: Preliminary stress inv
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3.25: Equal area stereonet s
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3.27: (A) Maximum principal
Page 95 and 96:
4.2 Numerical Methods Phase 2 and U
Page 97 and 98:
Stress-strain relationships are use
Page 99 and 100:
Rock mass failure is governed by th
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 4.5: (A) Model for tectonic
Page 103 and 104: The zero cohesion and low friction
Page 105 and 106: Figure 4.9: Model of yielding for C
Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.11: Model of differential
Page 109 and 110: Figure 4.14: Model of maximum stres
Page 111 and 112: stress field model. There is little
Page 113 and 114: clustering are indications of rock
Page 115 and 116: Figure 4.23: Contoured domains of s
Page 117 and 118: Figure 4.24: Fracture initiation th
Page 119 and 120: seismic Cluster 1, which correspond
Page 121 and 122: contains energetic events and is no
Page 123 and 124: preferentially oriented fracture pl
Page 125 and 126: methodologies employed are of value
Page 127 and 128: References Alcott, J. M., Kaiser, P
Page 129 and 130: Galkin, V., Mungall, J. (2005). Str
Page 131 and 132: Mungall, J. E., & Hanley, J. J. (20
Page 133 and 134: Appendix A Geological Maps and Samp
Page 135 and 136: A.2 Level Plans with Sample Locatio
Page 137 and 138: Figure A3: 7400 Level, modified for
Page 139 and 140: Figure A5: 7680 Level, modified for
Page 141 and 142: Figure A7: 7940 Ramp, modified from
Page 143 and 144: MICROSEISMIC EVENTS Source Radius A
Page 145 and 146: 2006 Event Frequency with Depth 600
Page 147 and 148: B.2 Spatial Distribution of Seismic
Page 149 and 150: Figure B11: Events between Jan 1, 2
Page 151 and 152: Figure B15: Events between Jan 1, 2
Page 153: Figure B19: Events between Jan 1, 2
Page 157 and 158: Seismic Moment 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0
Page 159 and 160: 143 Peak Velocity Parameter -2.5 -2
Page 161 and 162: B.4.2 Temporal Distribution of Clus
Page 163 and 164: 147 Static Stress Drop 5.0 5.5 6.0
Page 165 and 166: B.4.3 Temporal Distribution of Clus
Page 167 and 168: 151 Static Stress Drop 4.0 4.5 5.0
Page 169 and 170: Frequency-Magnitude Relation for Cl
Page 171 and 172: P-axis B-axis T-axis 155 Fault Plan
Page 173 and 174: P-axis B-axis T-axis Fault Plane 1
Page 179 and 180: D.1.1: Case 1 Models Figure D1: Cas
Page 181 and 182: Figure D3: Case 1, elastic models s
Page 183 and 184: A B C D Figure D5: Case 1, plastic
Page 185 and 186: A B C D Figure D7: Case 1, plastic
Page 187 and 188: D.1.2: Case 2 Models A B C D Figure
Page 189 and 190: D.1.3: Case 3 Models A B C Figure D
Page 191 and 192: D1.4 Tectonic Loading Models Figure
Page 193 and 194: D.2 Discussion of Phase 2 Models El
Page 195 and 196: Staged models were created in which
Page 197 and 198: Figure D17 (A) Elastic model showin
Page 199 and 200: Figure D19 (A) Elastic model showin
Page 201 and 202: • Similar damage zones surroundin
Page 203 and 204: ; ;================================
Page 205 and 206:
change jmat=1 range 0,1564.64 0,156
Page 207 and 208:
crack (845.579,718.676) (787.063,57
Page 209 and 210:
;===plum=== crack (0,355.2371429) (
Page 211 and 212:
crack (866.14,726.44) (838.2,737.61
Page 213 and 214:
crack (838.2,737.616) (815.848,771.
Page 215 and 216:
crack (815.848,771.144) (815.848,78
Page 217 and 218:
;===== define sub block ===========
Page 219 and 220:
E.9 S3:S1 Model for fracture reacti
Page 221 and 222:
yval= abs(z_syy(zi)) xyval= abs(z_s
Page 223 and 224:
and rearranged to , (Equation F4) .
Page 225:
Such that , (Equation F19) I is the
show all

title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?