27.10.2014 Views

title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This parameter reflects <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> intermediate principal stress relative to <strong>the</strong> maximum or<br />

minimum principal stress (Bellier and Zoback, 1995). As <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate<br />

principal stress approaches that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum principal stress, R approaches 0 and is indicative<br />

<strong>of</strong> an extensional stress regime; as it approaches <strong>the</strong> minimum principal stress, R approaches 1 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> rock is increasingly confined, indicative <strong>of</strong> a compressional regime (Bellier and Zoback, 1995;<br />

Bellier et al., 1997). Inversion for events on <strong>the</strong> 7400 Level yields R = 0.5 which indicates pure<br />

strike-slip failure.<br />

Stress orientations are comparable to <strong>the</strong> regional stress tensor, discussed in section 3.4.1. Stress<br />

inversion was also performed for localized clusters <strong>of</strong> events, Cluster 1 and Cluster 2, as<br />

previously defined. This was conducted using <strong>the</strong> exact solution method (described in Gephart<br />

and Forsyth, 1984) and a two-degree grid to identify perturbations in <strong>the</strong> local stress field where<br />

dense seismicity occurs. Cluster 3 was omitted from analysis due to insufficient data. Principal<br />

stresses for Cluster 2 approximate those for <strong>the</strong> 7400 Level stress inversion and <strong>the</strong> regional stress<br />

(Fig. 3.22). Principal stresses for Cluster 1, however, differ significantly from <strong>the</strong> regional stress.<br />

The inversion results with <strong>the</strong> minimal misfit identify a steeply-plunging maximum principal<br />

stress and a near-horizontal minimum principal stress (Fig. 3.23). An additional minimum<br />

principal stress axis that trends north is also identified. A second stress inversion for Cluster 1<br />

events (Fig. 3.24) shows two distinct stress orientations, though this solution has a slightly higher<br />

misfit from <strong>the</strong> previous solution (8.12 o , as compared to 7.63 o ). R parameter values for Cluster 1<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.05 and 0.10, respectively, demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> rock mass is under extension (uniaxial<br />

eccentric compression). Rotation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stress tensor in proximity to Cluster 1 may be responsible<br />

for high magnitude, high energy events, though <strong>the</strong> cause for this change is unclear.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!