title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University
title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University
title of the thesis - Department of Geology - Queen's University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
This parameter reflects <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> intermediate principal stress relative to <strong>the</strong> maximum or<br />
minimum principal stress (Bellier and Zoback, 1995). As <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediate<br />
principal stress approaches that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum principal stress, R approaches 0 and is indicative<br />
<strong>of</strong> an extensional stress regime; as it approaches <strong>the</strong> minimum principal stress, R approaches 1 and<br />
<strong>the</strong> rock is increasingly confined, indicative <strong>of</strong> a compressional regime (Bellier and Zoback, 1995;<br />
Bellier et al., 1997). Inversion for events on <strong>the</strong> 7400 Level yields R = 0.5 which indicates pure<br />
strike-slip failure.<br />
Stress orientations are comparable to <strong>the</strong> regional stress tensor, discussed in section 3.4.1. Stress<br />
inversion was also performed for localized clusters <strong>of</strong> events, Cluster 1 and Cluster 2, as<br />
previously defined. This was conducted using <strong>the</strong> exact solution method (described in Gephart<br />
and Forsyth, 1984) and a two-degree grid to identify perturbations in <strong>the</strong> local stress field where<br />
dense seismicity occurs. Cluster 3 was omitted from analysis due to insufficient data. Principal<br />
stresses for Cluster 2 approximate those for <strong>the</strong> 7400 Level stress inversion and <strong>the</strong> regional stress<br />
(Fig. 3.22). Principal stresses for Cluster 1, however, differ significantly from <strong>the</strong> regional stress.<br />
The inversion results with <strong>the</strong> minimal misfit identify a steeply-plunging maximum principal<br />
stress and a near-horizontal minimum principal stress (Fig. 3.23). An additional minimum<br />
principal stress axis that trends north is also identified. A second stress inversion for Cluster 1<br />
events (Fig. 3.24) shows two distinct stress orientations, though this solution has a slightly higher<br />
misfit from <strong>the</strong> previous solution (8.12 o , as compared to 7.63 o ). R parameter values for Cluster 1<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.05 and 0.10, respectively, demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> rock mass is under extension (uniaxial<br />
eccentric compression). Rotation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stress tensor in proximity to Cluster 1 may be responsible<br />
for high magnitude, high energy events, though <strong>the</strong> cause for this change is unclear.<br />
71