03.11.2014 Views

o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114<br />

anarchism: a beginner’s guide<br />

Anarchist observers of community have often testified to the<br />

success with which communitarians have realized this general goal.<br />

For example, when Augustin Souchy paid Spanish comrades a visit,<br />

he recorded the extraordinary conviviality of the group. Their<br />

settlement ‘was an economic and cultural commune based on<br />

voluntarism after the pattern of the Spanish collectividades’:<br />

Meals were served in a special communal dining room, laundry and<br />

clothing were allotted according to need and vacation money was<br />

disbursed from a common treasury just like in a happy family.<br />

Vacationers from outside gladly and voluntarily lent a helping hand<br />

in agricultural work. No written by-laws were needed. Every six<br />

months a chairman, treasurer and secretary were elected<br />

... The French peasants in the neighborhood at first regarded the<br />

foreign colonists with suspicion but soon changed their attitude ...<br />

after a short time friendly and neighbourly relations were established.<br />

I could close the notes in my diary with the blunt sentence:<br />

‘Overall impression of the free collective of d’Aymare: positive’. 45<br />

Yet on two particular issues – democratic decision-making and<br />

individual liberty – for which intentional communities have<br />

provided a platform for analysis, the record of anarchist community<br />

appears less certain.<br />

Discussions of democracy have tended to focus on the possibilities<br />

of consensus decision-making. The principle of consensus decisionmaking<br />

is straightforward: individuals come together, respecting<br />

each other as equal voices, to determine preferred courses of action<br />

by common agreement. The attraction of consensus decisionmaking<br />

is that it avoids the need for voting and seems, therefore, to<br />

offer a solution to the problem of majoritarianism. Specifically, in<br />

contrast to other systems of democracy (including the nonhierarchical,<br />

participatory, municipalist model developed by<br />

Bookchin), consensus decision-making does not allow minorities to<br />

be outvoted (coerced) by majorities. Yet as an alternative method of<br />

organizing anarchy, consensus decision-making is also problematic.<br />

Jo Freeman’s critique of anarcha-feminism, the Tyranny of<br />

Structurelessness, points to the root of the difficultly:<br />

Any group of people of whatever nature coming together for any<br />

length of time for any purpose, will inevitably structure itself in<br />

some fashion. The structure may be flexible, it may vary over time, it<br />

may evenly or unevenly distribute tasks, power and resources over

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!