03.11.2014 Views

o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76<br />

anarchism: a beginner’s guide<br />

Anarchists often argue that their critique of power is a distinctive<br />

mark of their ideology and they regularly compare their understandings<br />

to competing Marxist ideas. Yet it does not follow from their<br />

denunciation of state power that they reject the use of power in<br />

support of anarchist change and/or the development of anarchy. The<br />

significant division between anarchists on the issue of power is<br />

where it should be located. Power is not to be despised, whatever<br />

anarchists claim to the contrary.<br />

anarchism and liberty<br />

Anarchist theories of government, power and authority suggest that<br />

the state is an unnecessary evil. There are good reasons to seek its<br />

abolition and, contrary to the fears and suspicions of the state’s supporters,<br />

there is no reason to link its disappearance to savagery and<br />

disorder. On the contrary, the abolition of the state will put an end to<br />

violence and repression and herald a new – more harmonious –<br />

social order. Moreover, it will release individuals from the constraints<br />

of authority and enable them to enjoy their freedom.<br />

It is possible to extrapolate three anarchist conceptions of freedom<br />

from the critiques of authority. For example, the critique of<br />

command supports an idea of liberty as autonomy: the condition in<br />

which individuals determine their own affairs and subject their<br />

decisions to conscience or reason. The critique of control supports a<br />

concept of individuality: the liberty individuals enjoy to explore<br />

their creative potential and to develop their particular talents and<br />

capabilities. Finally, the critique of corruption supports a notion of<br />

altruism or brotherhood, in which individuals are able to fulfil their<br />

social roles and relationships through association with others.<br />

Anarchists combine these conceptions of authority and liberty in<br />

different ways. For example, Tolstoy linked his critique of authority<br />

as a form of moral corruption to an idea of freedom as autonomy.<br />

The only true liberty, he argued ‘consists in every man being able to<br />

live and act according to his own judgement’. 66 Similarly, Kropotkin<br />

tied his critique of authority as dependence to an altruistic conception<br />

of liberty inspired by the idea – which he called the principle of<br />

mutual aid – that individual freedom is inextricably linked to the<br />

freedom of the whole.<br />

Moreover, anarchists tend to regard these different conceptions<br />

of liberty as interconnected ideas, not discrete categories of thought.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!