o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
76<br />
anarchism: a beginner’s guide<br />
Anarchists often argue that their critique of power is a distinctive<br />
mark of their ideology and they regularly compare their understandings<br />
to competing Marxist ideas. Yet it does not follow from their<br />
denunciation of state power that they reject the use of power in<br />
support of anarchist change and/or the development of anarchy. The<br />
significant division between anarchists on the issue of power is<br />
where it should be located. Power is not to be despised, whatever<br />
anarchists claim to the contrary.<br />
anarchism and liberty<br />
Anarchist theories of government, power and authority suggest that<br />
the state is an unnecessary evil. There are good reasons to seek its<br />
abolition and, contrary to the fears and suspicions of the state’s supporters,<br />
there is no reason to link its disappearance to savagery and<br />
disorder. On the contrary, the abolition of the state will put an end to<br />
violence and repression and herald a new – more harmonious –<br />
social order. Moreover, it will release individuals from the constraints<br />
of authority and enable them to enjoy their freedom.<br />
It is possible to extrapolate three anarchist conceptions of freedom<br />
from the critiques of authority. For example, the critique of<br />
command supports an idea of liberty as autonomy: the condition in<br />
which individuals determine their own affairs and subject their<br />
decisions to conscience or reason. The critique of control supports a<br />
concept of individuality: the liberty individuals enjoy to explore<br />
their creative potential and to develop their particular talents and<br />
capabilities. Finally, the critique of corruption supports a notion of<br />
altruism or brotherhood, in which individuals are able to fulfil their<br />
social roles and relationships through association with others.<br />
Anarchists combine these conceptions of authority and liberty in<br />
different ways. For example, Tolstoy linked his critique of authority<br />
as a form of moral corruption to an idea of freedom as autonomy.<br />
The only true liberty, he argued ‘consists in every man being able to<br />
live and act according to his own judgement’. 66 Similarly, Kropotkin<br />
tied his critique of authority as dependence to an altruistic conception<br />
of liberty inspired by the idea – which he called the principle of<br />
mutual aid – that individual freedom is inextricably linked to the<br />
freedom of the whole.<br />
Moreover, anarchists tend to regard these different conceptions<br />
of liberty as interconnected ideas, not discrete categories of thought.