03.11.2014 Views

o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

strategies for change 147<br />

Over a hundred years since Kropotkin there is little sign that<br />

people feel compelled to seek alternatives to the services offered by<br />

the bureaucratic state. And though Ward is probably right that<br />

practical anarchism is more attractive to more people than strategies<br />

that promise revolution and civil war, it runs the risk of encouraging<br />

would-be anarchists to judge ‘what should be’ by the standards of<br />

‘what is’.<br />

protest<br />

The difference between protest and revolution used to be one of<br />

expectation: anarchists protested when they believed that there was<br />

little potential for revolution and in the hope that the protest would<br />

increase it. Now, some new anarchists – particularly those influenced<br />

by postmodern and poststructuralist ideas – see protest as the<br />

only legitimate form of revolutionary action. On the first view,<br />

protest provides a means of mobilizing peoples and, by provoking<br />

counteraction, of illustrating the truly repressive character of<br />

authority. On the second, it is not directed towards the removal or<br />

replacement of constituted power, but towards the expression and<br />

development of plural ways of acting. For both, however, it is<br />

possible to distinguish four categories of protest: constitutional<br />

action, symbolic action, direct action and civil disobedience. This<br />

section examines these forms of protest and then considers the ways<br />

in which anti-globalizers have employed them as instruments of<br />

mass protest.<br />

constitutional action<br />

Constitutional action describes orthodox, legal forms of protest.<br />

Owing to their denunciation of representative or parliamentary<br />

democracy anarchists are not usually associated with this form of<br />

action. Yet anarchists make good use of the legal framework and the<br />

liberal freedoms of speech, press and association it provides to<br />

produce books, leaflets and journals, organize public meetings,<br />

lecture series, summer schools, conferences and discussion groups.<br />

Today the internet provides anarchists with perhaps the most<br />

effective means of constitutional action – even primitivists who<br />

despise technology are well organized on the web. 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!