o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
strategies for change 147<br />
Over a hundred years since Kropotkin there is little sign that<br />
people feel compelled to seek alternatives to the services offered by<br />
the bureaucratic state. And though Ward is probably right that<br />
practical anarchism is more attractive to more people than strategies<br />
that promise revolution and civil war, it runs the risk of encouraging<br />
would-be anarchists to judge ‘what should be’ by the standards of<br />
‘what is’.<br />
protest<br />
The difference between protest and revolution used to be one of<br />
expectation: anarchists protested when they believed that there was<br />
little potential for revolution and in the hope that the protest would<br />
increase it. Now, some new anarchists – particularly those influenced<br />
by postmodern and poststructuralist ideas – see protest as the<br />
only legitimate form of revolutionary action. On the first view,<br />
protest provides a means of mobilizing peoples and, by provoking<br />
counteraction, of illustrating the truly repressive character of<br />
authority. On the second, it is not directed towards the removal or<br />
replacement of constituted power, but towards the expression and<br />
development of plural ways of acting. For both, however, it is<br />
possible to distinguish four categories of protest: constitutional<br />
action, symbolic action, direct action and civil disobedience. This<br />
section examines these forms of protest and then considers the ways<br />
in which anti-globalizers have employed them as instruments of<br />
mass protest.<br />
constitutional action<br />
Constitutional action describes orthodox, legal forms of protest.<br />
Owing to their denunciation of representative or parliamentary<br />
democracy anarchists are not usually associated with this form of<br />
action. Yet anarchists make good use of the legal framework and the<br />
liberal freedoms of speech, press and association it provides to<br />
produce books, leaflets and journals, organize public meetings,<br />
lecture series, summer schools, conferences and discussion groups.<br />
Today the internet provides anarchists with perhaps the most<br />
effective means of constitutional action – even primitivists who<br />
despise technology are well organized on the web. 51