03.11.2014 Views

o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

what is anarchism? 35<br />

‘the method of modern science, introduced by Kropotkin ... in short<br />

the anarchist scientifical way of thinking’ (Bulletin of the Anarchist<br />

International). In his well-known pamphlet Listen, Anarchist! Chaz<br />

Bufe also defends science, rationality and technology as the only permissible<br />

tools of anarchist dissent. In rather different ways, Rothbard<br />

and Rand also ground anarchism in an idea of reason. Rothbard’s<br />

work is based on a conception of natural law and Rand’s on what she<br />

calls ‘objective’ law, similarly discoverable through the exercise of<br />

reason. 60 The ‘post-objectivist’ George H. Smith captures the gist of<br />

the idea. Anarchism, he argues,<br />

is grounded in the belief that we are fully capable, through reason, of<br />

discerning the principles of justice; and that we are capable, through<br />

rational persuasion and voluntary agreement, of establishing whatever<br />

institutions are necessary for the preservation and enforcement<br />

of justice. 61<br />

The theoretical alignment of anarchism with liberal science was<br />

paralleled by a reassessment of liberalism’s political value. Some<br />

anarchist schools had long seen a positive element in liberal thought<br />

and like liberals claimed liberty as one of their primary goals. Yet not<br />

all groups of anarchists have asserted the priority of liberty with<br />

equal force. So-called individualists – particularly in America – have<br />

tended to be the most vocal advocates of liberty, identifying anarchism<br />

firmly with the defence of rights. Indeed, some writers have<br />

argued that liberal anarchism is a peculiarly American phenomenon.<br />

In her analysis of the relationship of anarchism to American<br />

political culture Voltairine de Cleyre argued that independence of<br />

thought, freedom from the tyranny of arbitrary government and<br />

the guarantee of civic rights were the hallmarks of both anarchist<br />

and liberal traditions. The patriots of the Revolution ‘took their<br />

starting point for deriving a minimum government upon the same<br />

sociological ground that the modern Anarchist derives the<br />

no-government theory; viz., that equal liberty is the political ideal’. 62<br />

Ayn Rand also argued that American anarchism had been shaped<br />

by the revolutionary tradition. Europeans, she added, had never<br />

‘fully grasped’ the American philosophy of the Rights of Man and<br />

remained firmly wedded to the competing principle of the common<br />

good. The Scottish anti-parliamentarian, Guy Aldred, offered a less<br />

culturally determined account, extending the American tradition<br />

back to the English homeland. The ‘English-speaking race, on both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!