o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
what is anarchism? 35<br />
‘the method of modern science, introduced by Kropotkin ... in short<br />
the anarchist scientifical way of thinking’ (Bulletin of the Anarchist<br />
International). In his well-known pamphlet Listen, Anarchist! Chaz<br />
Bufe also defends science, rationality and technology as the only permissible<br />
tools of anarchist dissent. In rather different ways, Rothbard<br />
and Rand also ground anarchism in an idea of reason. Rothbard’s<br />
work is based on a conception of natural law and Rand’s on what she<br />
calls ‘objective’ law, similarly discoverable through the exercise of<br />
reason. 60 The ‘post-objectivist’ George H. Smith captures the gist of<br />
the idea. Anarchism, he argues,<br />
is grounded in the belief that we are fully capable, through reason, of<br />
discerning the principles of justice; and that we are capable, through<br />
rational persuasion and voluntary agreement, of establishing whatever<br />
institutions are necessary for the preservation and enforcement<br />
of justice. 61<br />
The theoretical alignment of anarchism with liberal science was<br />
paralleled by a reassessment of liberalism’s political value. Some<br />
anarchist schools had long seen a positive element in liberal thought<br />
and like liberals claimed liberty as one of their primary goals. Yet not<br />
all groups of anarchists have asserted the priority of liberty with<br />
equal force. So-called individualists – particularly in America – have<br />
tended to be the most vocal advocates of liberty, identifying anarchism<br />
firmly with the defence of rights. Indeed, some writers have<br />
argued that liberal anarchism is a peculiarly American phenomenon.<br />
In her analysis of the relationship of anarchism to American<br />
political culture Voltairine de Cleyre argued that independence of<br />
thought, freedom from the tyranny of arbitrary government and<br />
the guarantee of civic rights were the hallmarks of both anarchist<br />
and liberal traditions. The patriots of the Revolution ‘took their<br />
starting point for deriving a minimum government upon the same<br />
sociological ground that the modern Anarchist derives the<br />
no-government theory; viz., that equal liberty is the political ideal’. 62<br />
Ayn Rand also argued that American anarchism had been shaped<br />
by the revolutionary tradition. Europeans, she added, had never<br />
‘fully grasped’ the American philosophy of the Rights of Man and<br />
remained firmly wedded to the competing principle of the common<br />
good. The Scottish anti-parliamentarian, Guy Aldred, offered a less<br />
culturally determined account, extending the American tradition<br />
back to the English homeland. The ‘English-speaking race, on both