03.11.2014 Views

o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72<br />

anarchism: a beginner’s guide<br />

You are free to accept or refuse.<br />

If you refuse, you become a part of a society of savages. Excluded<br />

from communion with the human race, you become an object of<br />

suspicion. Nothing protects you …<br />

If you agree to the compact, on the contrary, you become a part of<br />

the society of free men. All your brothers are bound to you, and<br />

promise you fidelity, friendship, aid, service, exchange. 59<br />

A notable objection to this position comes from Stirnerites like<br />

Dora Marsden. In a bad-tempered dispute with Benjamin Tucker<br />

about Proudhon, she denounced the idea of voluntary contract as<br />

impossible and dangerous and contrasted the anarchist vision of<br />

society to her own ideal, the union of egoists. Probably more<br />

anarchists align themselves with Proudhon than Marsden on this<br />

issue. And whether or not they like to identify anarchy with authority,<br />

some version of the idea usually underpins the concepts of trust,<br />

mutual support, voluntary co-operation – and, indeed, liberty –<br />

commonly identified with this order.<br />

anarchism and power<br />

Anarchists usually understand power to encompass a range of actions,<br />

from physical coercion to influence and persuasion and that it can be<br />

exercised both openly and in covert ways. Some anarchists suggest<br />

that power is a possession of individuals. Even if it happens to be<br />

exercised through the institutions of government, power is associated<br />

with the people who run those institutions rather than being vested in<br />

the institutions themselves. Other anarchists argue that power is best<br />

seen as a feature of the social system or structure. From this point of<br />

view, power is not wielded by individuals, but is something that<br />

permeates the institutions they inhabit. Anarchists who adopt the first<br />

view include anarcho-communists and anarcho-syndicalists, who<br />

condemn the state on the grounds of exploitation, and primitivists<br />

and others who associate the state with alienation. Those who adopt<br />

the second veer towards postmodern/poststructuralist anarchism.<br />

Anarchists have developed their ideas of power with reference to<br />

the state’s abolition, transcendence or destruction. Because they<br />

regard the nature of government in different ways, they also disagree<br />

about power and its legitimate use. Emphasizing the exploitative<br />

function of the state, anarcho-communists and syndicalists tend to<br />

identify the legitimate use of power with the collective or combined

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!