o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
focused on the question of violence. Anarchists have usually<br />
positioned themselves in the resulting debates by distinguishing<br />
revolutionary violence from terrorism. The table below gives an<br />
indication of where leading anarchists stand.<br />
Anarchist positions on violence and terrorism<br />
strategies for change 159<br />
Revolution Violence Terrorism<br />
Likely/necessary Unnecessary/unjustified Justified Immoral/ineffective<br />
Bakunin, Kropotkin, Proudhon, Reclus, Kropotkin, Tolstoy,<br />
Malatesta, Reclus, Tolstoy, Woodcock, Malatesta, Goldman, Bookchin,<br />
Makhno, Goldman, Clark, Ward Richards, Clark, Woodcock,<br />
Richards, Bookchin, Zerzan Ward<br />
Zerzan<br />
There are significant differences between these positions, even<br />
between those anarchists who fall in the same broad group. Debates<br />
between anarchists have centred on two particular issues: justification<br />
and explanation. Though the arguments are complex, it is possible<br />
to delineate some of the main lines of debate through the discussions<br />
of the Black Bloc.<br />
Anarchist responses to property damage perpetrated by the Black<br />
Bloc are both moral and pragmatic. Looking first at the critical case,<br />
the moral argument is that violence attracts a certain kind of<br />
authoritarian personality. Some writers simply describe members of<br />
the Black Bloc as hooligans and delinquents: ‘anarkids’ not anarchists.<br />
Their desire to commit violence is an indication of their urge to<br />
dominate and oppress. A variant on this theme is that even sincere<br />
militants are driven to authoritarianism through violence. Echoing<br />
discussions of Makhnovism and guerrillaism, some critics of the<br />
Black Bloc argue that property destruction encourages spikies to<br />
think in terms of militarization. One militant complains about a<br />
proposal to elect certain individuals and affinity groups to ‘tactical<br />
facilitation units’ from within the Black Bloc and to give these units<br />
‘command’ positions.<br />
The pragmatic case has three parts. First, critics argue that<br />
property damage is largely pointless and that whilst ‘there’s<br />
something to be said for blowing off steam’, those who engage in<br />
property destruction are more interested in dressing up ‘in gas<br />
masks and bandanas’ than they are in weighing up its usefulness as a