03.11.2014 Views

o_195qg5dto17o4rbc85q1ge61i84a.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118<br />

anarchism: a beginner’s guide<br />

parent-controlled day-care centres; free schools, printing co-ops;<br />

alternative radio groups, and so on. 54<br />

Recently anarchist anti-globalizers have associated community<br />

networking with the emergence of alternative economies. They<br />

point to the emergence of gift economies, living economies and local<br />

currency systems, to land reclamation projects undertaken by<br />

groups like Brazil’s Landless Workers’ Movement and programmes<br />

for sustainable and bio-diverse agriculture – for example, EcoVilla in<br />

Ecuador, to show how local experiments can provide a real alternative<br />

to corporate capitalism. 55 The enthusiasm with which European<br />

anarchists have greeted these experiments is often informed by<br />

an appreciation of their diversity and by a willingness to avoid automatically<br />

slotting them into frameworks of anarchist politics. In<br />

other cases, however, anarchists draw back to the anthropological<br />

arguments advanced by anarchists like Kropotkin and through the<br />

medium of ‘natural anarchy’ treat these experiments as examples of<br />

anarchy in action. The disagreement parallels the difference between<br />

those who understand the rhizome to describe a principle of organization<br />

and those who see it as a particular kind of eco-activity. Either<br />

way, there is a tendency within both positions to read anarchy into<br />

any network – to prioritize the movement over the goal.<br />

Whereas intentional communities seek to develop anarchy in<br />

isolation from wider society, networks aim to extend anarchist<br />

practices in all areas of social life – in rural and urban, industrial<br />

environments. The problem posed by networking is not, as Taylor<br />

suggests, how to develop inter-communal relations, but to show that<br />

the networks themselves are anarchist in any significant sense. Some<br />

anarchists have detected a potential fuzziness in networking theory.<br />

Only a year after embracing ‘refusal’ as a form of anarchist protest,<br />

Kingsley Widmer wrote in Anarchy:<br />

Our sympathy for countering culture should remain this side of the<br />

populist murkiness of the protesting young and its unpromising<br />

wooziness and passivity. Any critical effort suggests that we won’t get<br />

a ‘political end’ without some sort of ‘political means’. Certainly we<br />

need a radical change in sensibility, but if it does not include social<br />

and political effectiveness it will not end as a change at all. 56<br />

The difficulty to which Widmer points, has manifested itself in<br />

political as well as cultural spheres of action. In particular, debates<br />

between anarcha-feminists suggest that networking can blunt<br />

anarchist ideas rather than extend them. In the late 1960s and ’70s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!