12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the Pragmatic Tradition 115<br />

the rights <strong>of</strong> suspects <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue to pursue illegal detention<br />

practices. 29<br />

Let me now take another k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> issue which also raises<br />

the Diceyan approach to constitutional rights. We have, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, no constitution guarantee<strong>in</strong>g the freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

press <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> law, <strong>and</strong> Dicey's approach was to say that<br />

there was no such th<strong>in</strong>g as a freedom <strong>of</strong> the press. The freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> the press simply follows from the ord<strong>in</strong>ary rules <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>English</strong> law which say that everybody is free to do anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which is not specifically prohibited, but he does so under<br />

<strong>and</strong> subject to the law. So the press may publish anyth<strong>in</strong>g it<br />

chooses provided it observes the law <strong>of</strong> libel, the law <strong>of</strong> contempt<br />

<strong>and</strong> all the other laws which may affect the transmission<br />

or publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation. In Harman v. Home<br />

Office 30 a question was raised as to the liability <strong>of</strong> a solicitor<br />

for contempt <strong>of</strong> court <strong>in</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g on to a journalist documents<br />

<strong>in</strong> her possession under a discovery order, even<br />

though those documents had been read out <strong>in</strong> open court<br />

<strong>and</strong> could have been taken down by any reporter present.<br />

Lord Diplock, deliver<strong>in</strong>g the lead<strong>in</strong>g judgment <strong>in</strong> that case<br />

<strong>in</strong>sisted that the case raised no questions about fundamental<br />

rights. Indeed, he prefaced his speech by say<strong>in</strong>g that the<br />

case had attracted a good deal <strong>of</strong> publicity <strong>and</strong> that it was<br />

therefore desirable to clear up misconceptions by say<strong>in</strong>g<br />

what the case was not about.<br />

"It is not about freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, freedom <strong>of</strong> the press,<br />

openness <strong>of</strong> justice or documents com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the 'public<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>'; nor [he added for good measure, disagree-<br />

29 For a more general discussion <strong>of</strong> the weakness <strong>of</strong> habeas corpus as a<br />

remedy for protect<strong>in</strong>g fundamental rights today, see Lester, "The Constitution:<br />

Decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Renewal," <strong>in</strong> The Chang<strong>in</strong>g Constitution (ed. Jowell<br />

<strong>and</strong> Oliver 1985), at pp. 290-291.<br />

30 |"19831 1 A.C. 280.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!