Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the Pragmatic Tradition 115<br />
the rights <strong>of</strong> suspects <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue to pursue illegal detention<br />
practices. 29<br />
Let me now take another k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> issue which also raises<br />
the Diceyan approach to constitutional rights. We have, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, no constitution guarantee<strong>in</strong>g the freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />
press <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> law, <strong>and</strong> Dicey's approach was to say that<br />
there was no such th<strong>in</strong>g as a freedom <strong>of</strong> the press. The freedom<br />
<strong>of</strong> the press simply follows from the ord<strong>in</strong>ary rules <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>English</strong> law which say that everybody is free to do anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
which is not specifically prohibited, but he does so under<br />
<strong>and</strong> subject to the law. So the press may publish anyth<strong>in</strong>g it<br />
chooses provided it observes the law <strong>of</strong> libel, the law <strong>of</strong> contempt<br />
<strong>and</strong> all the other laws which may affect the transmission<br />
or publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation. In Harman v. Home<br />
Office 30 a question was raised as to the liability <strong>of</strong> a solicitor<br />
for contempt <strong>of</strong> court <strong>in</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g on to a journalist documents<br />
<strong>in</strong> her possession under a discovery order, even<br />
though those documents had been read out <strong>in</strong> open court<br />
<strong>and</strong> could have been taken down by any reporter present.<br />
Lord Diplock, deliver<strong>in</strong>g the lead<strong>in</strong>g judgment <strong>in</strong> that case<br />
<strong>in</strong>sisted that the case raised no questions about fundamental<br />
rights. Indeed, he prefaced his speech by say<strong>in</strong>g that the<br />
case had attracted a good deal <strong>of</strong> publicity <strong>and</strong> that it was<br />
therefore desirable to clear up misconceptions by say<strong>in</strong>g<br />
what the case was not about.<br />
"It is not about freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, freedom <strong>of</strong> the press,<br />
openness <strong>of</strong> justice or documents com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the 'public<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>'; nor [he added for good measure, disagree-<br />
29 For a more general discussion <strong>of</strong> the weakness <strong>of</strong> habeas corpus as a<br />
remedy for protect<strong>in</strong>g fundamental rights today, see Lester, "The Constitution:<br />
Decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> Renewal," <strong>in</strong> The Chang<strong>in</strong>g Constitution (ed. Jowell<br />
<strong>and</strong> Oliver 1985), at pp. 290-291.<br />
30 |"19831 1 A.C. 280.