12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Strengths <strong>of</strong> the Pragmatic Tradition 55<br />

sufficient to justify their conclusion, <strong>and</strong> it is noteworthy<br />

that the Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal has refused to<br />

follow the <strong>English</strong> Court on this po<strong>in</strong>t. 15<br />

Rights <strong>and</strong> Remedies<br />

I turn now to say someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the strengths <strong>of</strong> the <strong>English</strong><br />

legal tradition <strong>in</strong> the matter <strong>of</strong> rights <strong>and</strong> remedies. I said <strong>in</strong><br />

my first lecture that I thought there were still many respects<br />

<strong>in</strong> which our law was more remedy-oriented than rightsoriented,<br />

<strong>and</strong> I want now to give some examples <strong>of</strong> the way<br />

<strong>in</strong> which this orientation contributes to the pragmatic<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> the law.<br />

Pride <strong>of</strong> place here must go to two quite remarkable <strong>in</strong>novations<br />

which have recently been developed by the courts<br />

with respect to the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlocutory <strong>in</strong>junctions, namely<br />

the Mareva <strong>in</strong>junction, <strong>and</strong> Anton Filler <strong>in</strong>junction. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>novations have certa<strong>in</strong>ly justified the remark attributed to<br />

Harman J. <strong>in</strong> 1951 that, "Equity is not to be presumed to be<br />

<strong>of</strong> an age past child-bear<strong>in</strong>g." 16 These two new types <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>junction are now well known to practitioners especially <strong>in</strong><br />

certa<strong>in</strong> types <strong>of</strong> commercial litigation, but they concern<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> the law with which the average student is unlikely<br />

to come <strong>in</strong>to contact. Yet they are such an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

example <strong>of</strong> the practical strengths <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> remedies <strong>in</strong><br />

action, that they deserve some discussion <strong>in</strong> a lecture<br />

devoted to the pragmatic strengths <strong>of</strong> the <strong>English</strong> legal tradition.<br />

Both <strong>of</strong> these developments are still very young, <strong>in</strong>deed<br />

scarcely ten years old. The Mareva <strong>in</strong>junction was orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

devised to deal with the situation where a potential defend-<br />

15 R. v. Governor <strong>of</strong> HM. Prison, The Maze, ex. p. McKiernan (1985), N.I.L.R.<br />

Bullet<strong>in</strong>, No. 6, 1985, p. 6; see Note <strong>in</strong> [1985] Public <strong>Law</strong> 527.<br />

16 See R. E. Megarry, (1951) 67 L.Q.R. 506.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!