12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

162 <strong>Theory</strong> Beneath the Surface<br />

the law relat<strong>in</strong>g to breach <strong>of</strong> confidence, 32 <strong>and</strong> the Government<br />

has already promised legislation to implement it.<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> this Report conta<strong>in</strong>s a good deal <strong>of</strong> sense, but the<br />

weakest part <strong>of</strong> it is the section which expla<strong>in</strong>s why it is<br />

necessary to legislate at all. Of course the law is uncerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

some areas, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> course leav<strong>in</strong>g it to the courts will mean<br />

the the law will develop "piecemeal," 33 but this is an almost<br />

completely new area <strong>of</strong> law, which has so far been quite successfully<br />

built up by the courts on a case by case basis. Now<br />

unless we have already decided that judicial legislation is<br />

undesirable <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, this seems exactly the sort <strong>of</strong> area<br />

which is best left to development by the courts. It deals with<br />

private law rights, not the crim<strong>in</strong>al law; it relies almost<br />

entirely on the sort <strong>of</strong> concepts that the courts have been<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g with for centuries, such as express <strong>and</strong> implied<br />

undertak<strong>in</strong>gs, good faith, trust, <strong>and</strong> property; <strong>and</strong> it uses<br />

the good old common law <strong>and</strong> equitable remedies <strong>of</strong><br />

damages <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>junction. To cast this law <strong>in</strong>to legislative<br />

form at such an early stage <strong>of</strong> its development—even if the<br />

legislation clears up one or two problems before they<br />

arise—is positively to <strong>in</strong>vite rigidity <strong>and</strong> premature ossification,<br />

as <strong>in</strong>deed the Senate <strong>of</strong> the Inns <strong>of</strong> Court <strong>and</strong> the Bar<br />

both suggested to the <strong>Law</strong> Commission. And surely we now<br />

have enough experience <strong>of</strong> legislative law reform to appreciate<br />

that legislation usually creates as many new problems<br />

as it solves. It is true that the <strong>Law</strong> Commission did ask itself<br />

how best the law should be developed <strong>in</strong> the future, whether<br />

by legislation or the courts, <strong>and</strong> to some extent I am simply<br />

disagree<strong>in</strong>g with their judgment. But what concerns me is<br />

that questions <strong>of</strong> this k<strong>in</strong>d, posed <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

proposal, cannot be easily answered <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

a<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Com. No. 110, Cmnd. 8388 (1981).<br />

" See para. 6.1 <strong>of</strong> the Report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!