Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pragmatism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 27<br />
lar sets <strong>of</strong> concrete facts, which can be related to the case at<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, but the whole po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples is that they attempt<br />
to generalise, to get away from the details <strong>of</strong> the facts <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
cases. In the process <strong>of</strong> generalisation, pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />
also attempt to give some overall structure or rational shape<br />
to the law, not just <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> elegance, but <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> consistency, <strong>of</strong> the desire to ensure that like is<br />
treated alike.<br />
Now I do not claim, <strong>and</strong> it would be absurd to claim, that<br />
<strong>English</strong> law does not deal <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples or abstract generalisations<br />
or that <strong>English</strong> lawyers have no regard for overall<br />
consistency <strong>in</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> the law. Indeed, I doubt if<br />
any legal system could do this <strong>and</strong> still claim to be a legal<br />
system as we underst<strong>and</strong> that concept. But at the same<br />
time, every legal system has to h<strong>and</strong>le <strong>in</strong>dividual particular<br />
cases. At the end <strong>of</strong> the day, or anyhow at the end <strong>of</strong> every<br />
trial, <strong>and</strong> at the end <strong>of</strong> every practical legal problem, there<br />
are real people <strong>of</strong> real flesh <strong>and</strong> blood with real problems,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the law must attempt to answer these problems. Our<br />
legislation may make it an <strong>of</strong>fence for "any person" to do so<br />
<strong>and</strong> so, but it is not "any person" who gets f<strong>in</strong>ed or jailed<br />
for breach <strong>of</strong> the law. It is Jones or Smith or Green.<br />
Hypothetical problems, dreamt up by exam<strong>in</strong>ers, deal with<br />
A <strong>and</strong> B <strong>and</strong> X <strong>and</strong> Y, but the law has to award damages to<br />
White or Black. Exam<strong>in</strong>ation questions deal with Blackacre,<br />
but the law has to decide what to do with No. 19;<br />
Acacia Avenue when Mr. <strong>and</strong> Mrs. Brown, who used to live<br />
there, decide that they cannot bear each other's company<br />
any more. The problem <strong>of</strong> reconcil<strong>in</strong>g the needs <strong>of</strong> generali-'<br />
sation with the needs <strong>of</strong> the particular case is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
most difficult <strong>and</strong> delicate problems faced by every legal<br />
system. All that I claim is that <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g this problem,<br />
<strong>English</strong> law <strong>and</strong> lawyers today <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>e towards the particu-