Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pragmatism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 25<br />
declarations <strong>of</strong> constitutional rights, <strong>and</strong> effective means <strong>of</strong><br />
enforcement as well. 58 But he was at pa<strong>in</strong>s to <strong>in</strong>sist that the<br />
American Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights had little <strong>in</strong> common with European<br />
declarations <strong>of</strong> rights, <strong>and</strong> was <strong>in</strong> truth more on a par<br />
with the <strong>English</strong> Petition <strong>of</strong> Right; the <strong>English</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />
American "rights" were not <strong>in</strong> truth "declarations <strong>of</strong><br />
rights" <strong>in</strong> the "foreign" sense <strong>of</strong> the term, but rather<br />
judicial condemnation <strong>of</strong> claims <strong>and</strong> practices on the part <strong>of</strong><br />
the Crown thereby declared to be illegal. 59<br />
The answer to this apparent counter-example to Dicey's<br />
views may also have come from Sir Henry Ma<strong>in</strong>e. In his<br />
Popular Government, Ma<strong>in</strong>e had demonstrated to his own<br />
satisfaction, <strong>and</strong> perhaps also to Dicey's, that the American<br />
Constitution was <strong>in</strong> truth founded on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> the<br />
British Constitution <strong>of</strong> the late eighteenth century. It could<br />
thus be exempted from the criticisms directed aga<strong>in</strong>st European<br />
constitutions, notwithst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g its Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights. In<br />
any event, it is fair to say that the American experience was<br />
not much known or studied <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> until after the<br />
Second World War, <strong>and</strong> it is, <strong>of</strong> course, also true that the<br />
American Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights was not <strong>in</strong> practice such a potent<br />
source <strong>of</strong> practical <strong>and</strong> effective rights until quite recent<br />
times. So it is hardly surpris<strong>in</strong>g if <strong>in</strong> the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth <strong>and</strong><br />
early twentieth centuries <strong>English</strong> lawyers should have taken<br />
some satisfaction <strong>in</strong> the apparently greater ability <strong>of</strong> their<br />
own legal system to provide some effective guarantees for<br />
civil rights <strong>in</strong> comparison with European countries. For my<br />
purposes, it is really quite immaterial whether this view <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>English</strong> law was a grossly exaggerated picture <strong>of</strong> political<br />
reality, seen through rosy coloured Whiggish eyes, as some<br />
Ibid, at pp. 199-200.<br />
• w Ibid, at p. 200, n. 1.