Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Strengths <strong>of</strong> the Pragmatic Tradition 65<br />
orders are <strong>of</strong>ten made without the formality <strong>of</strong> issu<strong>in</strong>g a writ<br />
or hav<strong>in</strong>g an affidavit sworn, <strong>in</strong> complete reliance on <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
supplied by counsel. This procedure therefore<br />
depends entirely on the <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> the bar <strong>and</strong> would<br />
simply not be possible if the courts could not rely on counsel's<br />
word. And the Anton Piller orders also depend on the<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> the courts to rely on the solicitors who serve these<br />
orders <strong>in</strong> circumstances <strong>in</strong> which breaches <strong>of</strong> the peace or<br />
serious violence could easily occur. These are features <strong>of</strong> our<br />
legal system which contribute to its pragmatic strength, <strong>and</strong><br />
assist <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> effective legal remedies; yet<br />
they are features <strong>of</strong> the system which would rarely be<br />
studied <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the substantive law. They<br />
demonstrate, I th<strong>in</strong>k, how all the parts <strong>of</strong> a legal system,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the organisation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> the legal pr<strong>of</strong>ession,<br />
contribute their part to the law itself.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>junction has also been a useful <strong>in</strong>strument for<br />
devis<strong>in</strong>g new remedies <strong>in</strong> other areas where the law is <strong>in</strong><br />
need <strong>of</strong> development, but the courts have been hesitant to<br />
def<strong>in</strong>e or develop the substantive rights which would be<br />
implied by grant<strong>in</strong>g other remedies. So for <strong>in</strong>stance the law<br />
relat<strong>in</strong>g to breach <strong>of</strong> confidence, which has developed apace<br />
<strong>in</strong> recent years, has done so almost entirely through the<br />
medium <strong>of</strong> the remedy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>junction, rather than by the<br />
open expansion or development <strong>of</strong> substantive rights. 36 It<br />
could also be suggested that many other recent <strong>in</strong>novations<br />
<strong>in</strong> our private law, which have taken the form <strong>of</strong> grant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
judicial discretion, for <strong>in</strong>stance, to strike down the terms <strong>of</strong><br />
a contract 37 or set aside the terms <strong>of</strong> a will, 38 also illustrate<br />
M ' See generally the <strong>Law</strong> Commission Report, Breach <strong>of</strong> Confidence Cmnd.<br />
8388(1981).<br />
" See the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.<br />
'" See Inheritance (Provision for Family <strong>and</strong> Dependants) Act 1975.