Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
174 <strong>Theory</strong> Beneath the Surface<br />
courts, <strong>and</strong> not by the parties at all. 43 Then aga<strong>in</strong>, if contract<br />
law is based on the <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>of</strong> the parties, it is strange<br />
how <strong>of</strong>ten liability only seems to arise after one party has<br />
changed his position <strong>in</strong> reliance on the other's promises or<br />
behaviour, someth<strong>in</strong>g which hardly seems relevant if liability<br />
depends on <strong>in</strong>tentions. The truth is that the whole role<br />
<strong>of</strong> reliance as a basis <strong>of</strong> liability has yet to be adequately<br />
acknowledged <strong>in</strong> modern law, <strong>and</strong> its relationship to contractual<br />
<strong>in</strong>tent also rema<strong>in</strong>s to be understood. There is<br />
arguably a good deal <strong>of</strong> implicit theory govern<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
matters already embedded <strong>in</strong> the law, but it has not yet<br />
been adequately developed <strong>and</strong> made explicit <strong>in</strong> the courts.<br />
Let me now say a little about the development <strong>of</strong> modern<br />
tort law. The picture is similar <strong>in</strong> some respects, but differs<br />
<strong>in</strong> other respects from that relat<strong>in</strong>g to contracts. It differs, <strong>in</strong><br />
particular, <strong>in</strong> that tort law, ancient <strong>and</strong> modern, has never<br />
had a neat <strong>and</strong> tidy theoretical structure, like contract.<br />
Moreover, the <strong>in</strong>dividual torts, <strong>and</strong> especially negligence,<br />
have cont<strong>in</strong>ued to play a much more important role <strong>in</strong> tort<br />
theory than the <strong>in</strong>dividual types <strong>of</strong> contract play <strong>in</strong> contract<br />
theory. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, we f<strong>in</strong>d that there are <strong>in</strong> the<br />
modern law some general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> liability, <strong>in</strong> tort no<br />
less than <strong>in</strong> contract, <strong>and</strong> we also f<strong>in</strong>d some k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> structure<br />
<strong>in</strong> the law, or at least a variety <strong>of</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which the law<br />
can be structured. None <strong>of</strong> these is a wholly satisfactory way<br />
<strong>of</strong> try<strong>in</strong>g to structure the law, <strong>and</strong> no s<strong>in</strong>gle theoretical basis<br />
for the subject has yet emerged, unless we take account <strong>of</strong><br />
43 Notice how Lord Scarman <strong>in</strong>sists <strong>in</strong> Tai H<strong>in</strong>g Cotton Mill Ltd. v. Liu<br />
Chong H<strong>in</strong>g Bank [1985] 2 All E.R. 947, at p. 955, that even implied<br />
terms <strong>in</strong> a contract are not "imposed" on the parties by the courts; but<br />
cf. Lord Wilberforce, more realistically us<strong>in</strong>g the language <strong>of</strong> "imposition"<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Panalp<strong>in</strong>a decision [1981] A.C. 675, at p. 696.