12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 <strong>Theory</strong> Beneath the Surface<br />

courts, <strong>and</strong> not by the parties at all. 43 Then aga<strong>in</strong>, if contract<br />

law is based on the <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>of</strong> the parties, it is strange<br />

how <strong>of</strong>ten liability only seems to arise after one party has<br />

changed his position <strong>in</strong> reliance on the other's promises or<br />

behaviour, someth<strong>in</strong>g which hardly seems relevant if liability<br />

depends on <strong>in</strong>tentions. The truth is that the whole role<br />

<strong>of</strong> reliance as a basis <strong>of</strong> liability has yet to be adequately<br />

acknowledged <strong>in</strong> modern law, <strong>and</strong> its relationship to contractual<br />

<strong>in</strong>tent also rema<strong>in</strong>s to be understood. There is<br />

arguably a good deal <strong>of</strong> implicit theory govern<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

matters already embedded <strong>in</strong> the law, but it has not yet<br />

been adequately developed <strong>and</strong> made explicit <strong>in</strong> the courts.<br />

Let me now say a little about the development <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

tort law. The picture is similar <strong>in</strong> some respects, but differs<br />

<strong>in</strong> other respects from that relat<strong>in</strong>g to contracts. It differs, <strong>in</strong><br />

particular, <strong>in</strong> that tort law, ancient <strong>and</strong> modern, has never<br />

had a neat <strong>and</strong> tidy theoretical structure, like contract.<br />

Moreover, the <strong>in</strong>dividual torts, <strong>and</strong> especially negligence,<br />

have cont<strong>in</strong>ued to play a much more important role <strong>in</strong> tort<br />

theory than the <strong>in</strong>dividual types <strong>of</strong> contract play <strong>in</strong> contract<br />

theory. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, we f<strong>in</strong>d that there are <strong>in</strong> the<br />

modern law some general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> liability, <strong>in</strong> tort no<br />

less than <strong>in</strong> contract, <strong>and</strong> we also f<strong>in</strong>d some k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> structure<br />

<strong>in</strong> the law, or at least a variety <strong>of</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which the law<br />

can be structured. None <strong>of</strong> these is a wholly satisfactory way<br />

<strong>of</strong> try<strong>in</strong>g to structure the law, <strong>and</strong> no s<strong>in</strong>gle theoretical basis<br />

for the subject has yet emerged, unless we take account <strong>of</strong><br />

43 Notice how Lord Scarman <strong>in</strong>sists <strong>in</strong> Tai H<strong>in</strong>g Cotton Mill Ltd. v. Liu<br />

Chong H<strong>in</strong>g Bank [1985] 2 All E.R. 947, at p. 955, that even implied<br />

terms <strong>in</strong> a contract are not "imposed" on the parties by the courts; but<br />

cf. Lord Wilberforce, more realistically us<strong>in</strong>g the language <strong>of</strong> "imposition"<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Panalp<strong>in</strong>a decision [1981] A.C. 675, at p. 696.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!