12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

168 <strong>Theory</strong> Beneath the Surface<br />

theory <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> because it is already deeply embedded <strong>in</strong><br />

the legal system.<br />

But there are other areas <strong>of</strong> the law where it does seems to<br />

me that the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> academic lawyers has been pr<strong>of</strong>ound,<br />

though usually unacknowledged. Let me illustrate<br />

this by look<strong>in</strong>g at the development <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> the most central<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> the common law, the law <strong>of</strong> contract <strong>and</strong> the<br />

law <strong>of</strong> tort. I have written at length elsewhere <strong>of</strong> the emergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> modern contract doctr<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g the last two centuries<br />

or so, so I can deal with this briefly here. I have<br />

argued—<strong>and</strong> there was noth<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong> this—that the<br />

judges <strong>of</strong> the period 1770 to 1870 were greatly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />

the theories <strong>of</strong> political economy, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular by the<br />

ideology <strong>of</strong> laissezfaire. Much <strong>of</strong> this political economy was<br />

itself <strong>of</strong> a very theoretical character, <strong>and</strong> took its orig<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, from the great work <strong>of</strong> Adam Smith, The Wealth <strong>of</strong><br />

Nations, <strong>and</strong> he, I need hardly add, was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow. In addition, I suggested that some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the most fundamental ideas underly<strong>in</strong>g the law <strong>of</strong> contract<br />

were only given expression <strong>in</strong> the writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> theorists<br />

<strong>and</strong> philosophers. Take, for example, the idea that the law<br />

<strong>of</strong> contract is pr<strong>in</strong>cipally designed for the protection <strong>of</strong><br />

reasonable expectations—what is today <strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be<br />

the one key pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> contract. This idea may<br />

have been implicit <strong>in</strong> the decisions <strong>of</strong> the judges, but they<br />

did not openly acknowledge it. It is, however, to be found <strong>in</strong><br />

the philosophical writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> David Hume 36 <strong>and</strong> Adam<br />

Smith, 37 <strong>and</strong> it was recognised as <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ound legal importance<br />

by that greatest <strong>of</strong> all legal theorists, Jeremy Bentham.<br />

He, <strong>in</strong> his usual fashion, belaboured the lawyers for fail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

36 Treatise <strong>of</strong> Human Nature, Book II, Part II. Section I.<br />

37 Lectures on Jurisprudence (ed. Meek, Raphael <strong>and</strong> Ste<strong>in</strong> 1978), pp. 87-88.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!