Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
168 <strong>Theory</strong> Beneath the Surface<br />
theory <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> because it is already deeply embedded <strong>in</strong><br />
the legal system.<br />
But there are other areas <strong>of</strong> the law where it does seems to<br />
me that the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> academic lawyers has been pr<strong>of</strong>ound,<br />
though usually unacknowledged. Let me illustrate<br />
this by look<strong>in</strong>g at the development <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> the most central<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> the common law, the law <strong>of</strong> contract <strong>and</strong> the<br />
law <strong>of</strong> tort. I have written at length elsewhere <strong>of</strong> the emergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> modern contract doctr<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g the last two centuries<br />
or so, so I can deal with this briefly here. I have<br />
argued—<strong>and</strong> there was noth<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong> this—that the<br />
judges <strong>of</strong> the period 1770 to 1870 were greatly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />
the theories <strong>of</strong> political economy, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular by the<br />
ideology <strong>of</strong> laissezfaire. Much <strong>of</strong> this political economy was<br />
itself <strong>of</strong> a very theoretical character, <strong>and</strong> took its orig<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, from the great work <strong>of</strong> Adam Smith, The Wealth <strong>of</strong><br />
Nations, <strong>and</strong> he, I need hardly add, was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow. In addition, I suggested that some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the most fundamental ideas underly<strong>in</strong>g the law <strong>of</strong> contract<br />
were only given expression <strong>in</strong> the writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> theorists<br />
<strong>and</strong> philosophers. Take, for example, the idea that the law<br />
<strong>of</strong> contract is pr<strong>in</strong>cipally designed for the protection <strong>of</strong><br />
reasonable expectations—what is today <strong>of</strong>ten assumed to be<br />
the one key pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> contract. This idea may<br />
have been implicit <strong>in</strong> the decisions <strong>of</strong> the judges, but they<br />
did not openly acknowledge it. It is, however, to be found <strong>in</strong><br />
the philosophical writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> David Hume 36 <strong>and</strong> Adam<br />
Smith, 37 <strong>and</strong> it was recognised as <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ound legal importance<br />
by that greatest <strong>of</strong> all legal theorists, Jeremy Bentham.<br />
He, <strong>in</strong> his usual fashion, belaboured the lawyers for fail<strong>in</strong>g<br />
36 Treatise <strong>of</strong> Human Nature, Book II, Part II. Section I.<br />
37 Lectures on Jurisprudence (ed. Meek, Raphael <strong>and</strong> Ste<strong>in</strong> 1978), pp. 87-88.