12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Theory</strong> Beneath the Surface 163<br />

satisfactory theory <strong>of</strong> the function <strong>of</strong> the courts. If, as the<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Commission thought <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>stance, it would be<br />

undesirable to leave the development <strong>of</strong> the subject to the<br />

courts, this may itself be because the courts are also too<br />

restrictive <strong>in</strong> their approach to law reform. And that <strong>in</strong> turn<br />

may be because they also lack a satisfactory theory <strong>of</strong> law<br />

reform.<br />

You may th<strong>in</strong>k the very idea <strong>of</strong> a theory <strong>of</strong> law reform is<br />

rather absurd. Who needs a theory to decide if the law is<br />

unsatisfactory <strong>and</strong> how best to reform it? Evidently what<br />

is needed is research <strong>in</strong>to the facts, study <strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

law <strong>and</strong> its deficiencies, <strong>and</strong> then the formulation <strong>of</strong> proposals<br />

for reform. Evidently, <strong>in</strong>deed. But what is so evident<br />

about this? It is <strong>in</strong> truth a method <strong>of</strong> law reform<br />

based on an implicit theory; at least today perhaps the<br />

theory is implicit, but it was explicit enough <strong>in</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

its <strong>in</strong>ventor, Jeremy Bentham. It was Bentham who propounded<br />

this method <strong>of</strong> legal change, <strong>and</strong> you will notice<br />

how even this theory makes implicit use <strong>of</strong> another theory,<br />

namely the theory that what the law is must be fundamentally<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished from what it ought to be. This crucial tenet<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bentham's own positivist theory <strong>of</strong> law underlay his<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> law reform. Bentham <strong>in</strong>sisted that before the law<br />

can be reformed we have to dist<strong>in</strong>guish very clearly what it<br />

currently is from what we th<strong>in</strong>k it should be. The first step<br />

is to f<strong>in</strong>d out what the law is. The second is to discover what<br />

is wrong with it. The third step is to decide how to put it<br />

right, <strong>and</strong> the fourth step is to change the law to give effect<br />

to what we have decided must be done. This change should<br />

be carried out by an exercise <strong>of</strong> sovereign power—by legislation,<br />

for Bentham, I need scarcely rem<strong>in</strong>d you, was a<br />

great believer <strong>in</strong> legislation by legislatures, <strong>and</strong> an emphatic<br />

opponent to all judicial legislation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!