Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pragmatism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 11<br />
commit it, it follows "as a matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>exorable logic" 23 that<br />
the prosecution must prove that the accused had the requisite<br />
<strong>in</strong>tent. So if he thought the victim was consent<strong>in</strong>g, even<br />
though she was not, it is immaterial that his mistake was<br />
not one which a reasonable man would have made. Lord<br />
Hailsham also added that he could not reconcile it with his<br />
conscience to sanction as part <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> a logical<br />
impossibility, <strong>and</strong> that even authority could not properly<br />
lead to such a result, <strong>and</strong> should not be followed if it<br />
seemed to do so. 24 But only a year later the House <strong>of</strong> Lords<br />
resolutely refused to be swayed by this appeal to logic <strong>in</strong> the<br />
very similar problem which arose <strong>in</strong> D.P.P. v. Majewski. 25<br />
No matter that a person does not have the <strong>in</strong>tent to commit<br />
a crime, if the reason why he does not have that <strong>in</strong>tent is<br />
that he is so drunk as to have formed no <strong>in</strong>tent at all, he will<br />
be guilty, proclaims the Majewski rul<strong>in</strong>g. Several members<br />
<strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Lords acknowledged that they were depart<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from strict logic <strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g this decision, but as on so<br />
many other occasions, they were not dismayed. The law<br />
accords with "justice, ethics <strong>and</strong> commonsense" said Lord<br />
Salmon, even if not with strict logic. 26<br />
The aversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> judges to "strict logic" seems to<br />
be even greater than their aversion to ord<strong>in</strong>ary logic. A cursory<br />
look through the <strong>English</strong> case law for the last ten years,<br />
which was made possible by the wonders <strong>of</strong> Lexis, has<br />
23 [1976] A.C. 182 at p. 214.<br />
24 [1976] A.C. 182 at p. 213.<br />
25 [1977] A.C. 443.<br />
26 [1977] A.C. 443 at p. 484. The decision was seen by many (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
perhaps most <strong>of</strong> the law lords themselves) as be<strong>in</strong>g not merely "antilogical"<br />
but also "anti-academic" because so many academic crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />
lawyers had taken a different view <strong>of</strong> the legal issues <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
Majewski. But not all academics took this view, see, e.g. Ashworth,<br />
"Reason, Logic <strong>and</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Liability" (1975), 91 L.Q.R. 102.