12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pragmatism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 11<br />

commit it, it follows "as a matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>exorable logic" 23 that<br />

the prosecution must prove that the accused had the requisite<br />

<strong>in</strong>tent. So if he thought the victim was consent<strong>in</strong>g, even<br />

though she was not, it is immaterial that his mistake was<br />

not one which a reasonable man would have made. Lord<br />

Hailsham also added that he could not reconcile it with his<br />

conscience to sanction as part <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> a logical<br />

impossibility, <strong>and</strong> that even authority could not properly<br />

lead to such a result, <strong>and</strong> should not be followed if it<br />

seemed to do so. 24 But only a year later the House <strong>of</strong> Lords<br />

resolutely refused to be swayed by this appeal to logic <strong>in</strong> the<br />

very similar problem which arose <strong>in</strong> D.P.P. v. Majewski. 25<br />

No matter that a person does not have the <strong>in</strong>tent to commit<br />

a crime, if the reason why he does not have that <strong>in</strong>tent is<br />

that he is so drunk as to have formed no <strong>in</strong>tent at all, he will<br />

be guilty, proclaims the Majewski rul<strong>in</strong>g. Several members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Lords acknowledged that they were depart<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from strict logic <strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g this decision, but as on so<br />

many other occasions, they were not dismayed. The law<br />

accords with "justice, ethics <strong>and</strong> commonsense" said Lord<br />

Salmon, even if not with strict logic. 26<br />

The aversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> judges to "strict logic" seems to<br />

be even greater than their aversion to ord<strong>in</strong>ary logic. A cursory<br />

look through the <strong>English</strong> case law for the last ten years,<br />

which was made possible by the wonders <strong>of</strong> Lexis, has<br />

23 [1976] A.C. 182 at p. 214.<br />

24 [1976] A.C. 182 at p. 213.<br />

25 [1977] A.C. 443.<br />

26 [1977] A.C. 443 at p. 484. The decision was seen by many (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

perhaps most <strong>of</strong> the law lords themselves) as be<strong>in</strong>g not merely "antilogical"<br />

but also "anti-academic" because so many academic crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />

lawyers had taken a different view <strong>of</strong> the legal issues <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

Majewski. But not all academics took this view, see, e.g. Ashworth,<br />

"Reason, Logic <strong>and</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Liability" (1975), 91 L.Q.R. 102.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!