12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192 Index<br />

GUIDE-LINES, 33,129<br />

HABEAS CORPUS, 113<br />

HOUSE OF LORDS, 158<br />

confusion cleared up by<br />

legislation, 102<br />

power to reverse decisions,<br />

67,85,182<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS, 24<br />

IMPLIEDTERMS, 104—105<br />

INDUSTRIAL ACTION,<br />

remedies <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> law, 19<br />

etseq.<br />

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS, 71-72<br />

INTERPRETATION, 30,165<br />

common sense <strong>in</strong>, 82<br />

<strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>of</strong> Parliament, 98<br />

literal, 96<br />

JUDICIAL REVIEW, 53-54<br />

JUDICIARY,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong>, 22<br />

constitutional powers, 149<br />

etseq.<br />

decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process, 64,<br />

67,69,73<br />

drawn from the Bar, 111<br />

function <strong>of</strong>, 35,154<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong>, 108-109<br />

Kilmuir rules, 107, 109<br />

lawmakers, role as, 37, 154<br />

etseq.<br />

law reform, <strong>and</strong>, 161<br />

reliance on academics, 38<br />

status <strong>of</strong>, 40,166<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>, 41<br />

KILMUIR RULES, 107<br />

challenge to, 109<br />

LAW,<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong>, 96<br />

rationality <strong>of</strong>, 93,95<br />

LAW REPORTS, 71<br />

LEGAL REASONING,<br />

logic, use <strong>of</strong>, 8 etseq.<br />

rationality <strong>and</strong>, 17,93,95<br />

reasonableness, 17<br />

LEGISLATION, 28<br />

draft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>, 31<br />

LITIGATION, 66<br />

affidavit evidence, 71<br />

cost <strong>of</strong>, 72<br />

fact-f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g process, 69, 75<br />

"floodgates" argument,<br />

76-78<br />

modern procedures, 70<br />

LOGIC, 8 etseq.<br />

action for loss <strong>of</strong> consortium, 51<br />

application <strong>of</strong>, 15<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, 45<br />

con traditions, 15<br />

deductive, 13<br />

facts, stress on, 53<br />

judicial review, <strong>and</strong>, 53<br />

logical impossibility, 11<br />

mathematical, 45<br />

special damages, 47<br />

strict, 11-13,14,49<br />

used to produce sensible<br />

results, 100<br />

use <strong>of</strong>, 13,44<br />

LORD CHANCELLOR,<br />

role <strong>of</strong>, 107<br />

judicial appo<strong>in</strong>tments by, 111<br />

MAREVA INJUNCTION, 55,57<br />

etseq.<br />

PARDON, 145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!