12.11.2014 Views

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

Pragmatism and Theory in English Law - College of Social Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pragmatism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 31<br />

what that pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is, <strong>and</strong> how it is to be developed, will<br />

very soon become settled by precedent.<br />

Of course, it may be objected, part <strong>of</strong> the fault for all this<br />

lies <strong>in</strong> the way legislation is drafted <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>. Most legislation<br />

is not drafted <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> a statement <strong>of</strong> true pr<strong>in</strong>ciples,<br />

broad generalisations. Much <strong>of</strong> it is drafted <strong>in</strong> the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> specific rules, ad hoc solutions to particular<br />

problems. Nobody would read a modern <strong>English</strong> statute for<br />

its literary elegance as it was said that Flaubert used to read<br />

the French Code Civil. 67 But this only goes to confirm my<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t about the power <strong>of</strong> the pragmatic approach <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong><br />

law. Even when we do use legislation, an <strong>in</strong>strument well<br />

suited to the enactment <strong>of</strong> broad pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>and</strong> generalisations,<br />

we f<strong>in</strong>d ourselves so shackled by traditional common<br />

law methodology, that we fail to use legislation <strong>in</strong> an effective<br />

<strong>and</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipled manner. Our preference for precedent<br />

or pragmatism over pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is thus itself partly responsible<br />

for the unsatisfactory way we h<strong>and</strong>le statute law. In<br />

particular, the detailed <strong>and</strong> crabbed style <strong>of</strong> legislative<br />

draft<strong>in</strong>g means that it becomes almost impossible for the<br />

courts to draw pr<strong>in</strong>ciples from legislation, to treat legislation<br />

as a liv<strong>in</strong>g graft on the common law, <strong>and</strong> to develop<br />

the law as an <strong>in</strong>tegral whole. 68 What is more, the blame for<br />

this aspect <strong>of</strong> legislation cannot <strong>in</strong> fairness be laid at the<br />

legislature's door. Most legislation, as I have said, derives<br />

from politicians <strong>and</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrators, but it is lawyers who<br />

are responsible for the form <strong>and</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> legislation. It is<br />

government lawyers who have persuaded politicians <strong>and</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrators that legislation should be drafted <strong>in</strong> the way<br />

67 See for some fierce, but not unjustified, criticisms <strong>of</strong> the style <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong><br />

legislative draft<strong>in</strong>g, Honore, The Quest For Security: Employees, Tenants,<br />

Wives, (Hamlyn Lectures, 34th Series, 1982), pp. 118-123.<br />

68 See my "Common <strong>Law</strong> <strong>and</strong> Statute <strong>Law</strong>," (1985) 48 M.L.R. 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!