15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4. Computing Travel Time <strong>and</strong> Derivatives 89<br />

lar problem at h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> thus it produced more detailed computations<br />

where it was necessary, as in the case <strong>of</strong> highly curved seismic rays.<br />

Lee et ul. (1982b) applied the numerical technique developed by<br />

Pereyra ef al. (1980) to trace seismic rays in several two- <strong>and</strong> threedimensional<br />

velocity models. Three different types <strong>of</strong> models were considered:<br />

continuous <strong>and</strong> piecewise continuous velocity models given in<br />

analytic form, <strong>and</strong> general models specified by velocity values at grid<br />

points <strong>of</strong> a nonuniform mesh. Results <strong>of</strong> their numerical solutions were in<br />

excellent agreement with several known analytic solutions.<br />

Using an initial value approach for tracing seismic rays, Luk et ul.<br />

(1982) noted tliat solving Eq. (4.53) was computationally more efficient<br />

than solving Eq. (4.33) because trigonometric functions were not involved.<br />

They solved Eq. (4.53) by numerical integration using the DE-<br />

ROOT subroutine described by Shampine <strong>and</strong> Gordon (1975). Thus starting<br />

from a given seismic source, a set <strong>of</strong> initial direction angles may be<br />

used to trace out a corresponding set <strong>of</strong> ray paths. This is very useful in<br />

studying the behavior <strong>of</strong> seismic rays in a heterogeneous medium.<br />

For two-point seismic ray tracing, one may solve a series <strong>of</strong> initial value<br />

problems starting from one end point <strong>and</strong> design a scheme so that the ray<br />

converges to the other end point. Luk et al. (1982) solved Eq. (4.53) by<br />

shooting a ray from the source <strong>and</strong> adjusting the ray to hit the receiver<br />

using a nonlinear equation solver. This technique was found to be just as<br />

efficient as the method <strong>of</strong> Pereyra et ul. (1980) which used a boundary<br />

value approach.<br />

4.4. Computing Travel Time, Derivatives, <strong>and</strong> Take-Off Angle<br />

In many seismological problems, such as earthquake location, we need<br />

to compute travel times between a source <strong>and</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> stations, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

corresponding spatial derivatives evaluated at the source. Take-<strong>of</strong>f angles<br />

<strong>of</strong> the seismic rays at the source to a set <strong>of</strong> stations are also needed to<br />

determine the fault-plane solution. For a heterogeneous earth model,<br />

travel times, derivatives, <strong>and</strong> take-<strong>of</strong>f angles can be computed by solving<br />

the ray equation as discussed in the previous section. But in practice, we<br />

may not have enough information to construct a realistic threedimensional<br />

model for the velocity structure <strong>of</strong> the crust <strong>and</strong> upper mantle<br />

beneath a <strong>microearthquake</strong> network. Furthermore, it is expensive to solve<br />

the three-dimensional ray equation numerically. For instance, about 0.3<br />

sec CPU time in a large computer (e.g., IBM 3701168) is required to find<br />

the minimum time path between a source <strong>and</strong> a station in a typical threedimensional<br />

heterogeneous model. Because we may need to trace thou-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!