15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 6. Methods <strong>of</strong> Dutcr Analysk<br />

important axes: the axes normal to the two nodal planes (A <strong>and</strong> Ci, the P<br />

axis, <strong>and</strong> the Taxis. In the general case, the Taxis is 45" from the A <strong>and</strong> C<br />

axes <strong>and</strong> lies in the compressional quadrant, <strong>and</strong> the P axis is 90" from the<br />

T axis. The P axis is commonly assumed to represent the direction <strong>of</strong><br />

maximum compressive stress, whereas the T axis is commonly assumed<br />

to represent the direction <strong>of</strong> maximum tensile stress. If we select the first<br />

nodal plane (arc WBCE) as the fault plane, then point C (which represents<br />

the axis normal to the auxiliary plane) is the slip vector <strong>and</strong> is commonly<br />

assumed to be parallel to the resolved shearing stress in the fault plane.<br />

This assumption is physically reasonable if earthquakes occur in homogeneous<br />

rocks. Many if not most earthquakes occur on preexisting faults in<br />

heterogeneous rocks, <strong>and</strong> thus the assumption is invalid on theoretical<br />

grounds. Readers are referred to McKenzie (1969) <strong>and</strong> Raleigh et al.<br />

( 1972) for discussions <strong>of</strong> the relations between fault-plane solutions <strong>and</strong><br />

directions <strong>of</strong> principal stresses. It must also be emphasized that we cannot<br />

distinguish from P-wave first motion data alone which nodal plane represents<br />

the fault plane. However, geological information on existing faults in<br />

the region <strong>of</strong> study or distribution <strong>of</strong> aftershocks will usually help in<br />

selecting the proper fault plane.<br />

(3d) Let us now summarize our results from analyzing the P-wave first<br />

motion plot using an equal-area net. As shown in Fig. 30 we have<br />

(a) Fault plane (chosen in this case with the aid <strong>of</strong> local geology): strike<br />

N 90" E, dip 44" N.<br />

(b) Auxiliary plane: strike N 54" W, dip 52" SW.<br />

(c) Slip vector C : strike N 36" E, plunge 38".<br />

(d) P axis: strike N 161" W, plunge 4".<br />

(e) Taxis: strike N 96" E, plunge 70".<br />

(0 The diagram represents reverse faulting with a minor left-lateral<br />

component.<br />

6.2.2.<br />

Pitfalls in Using P-Wave First Motion Data<br />

Unlike arrival times, which have a range <strong>of</strong> values for their errors, a<br />

P-wave first motion reading is either correct or wrong. One <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

difficult tasks in operating a <strong>microearthquake</strong> network is to ensure that the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> motion recorded on the seismograms corresponds to the true<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> ground motion. Care must be taken to check the station<br />

polarities. Large nuclear explosions or large teleseismic events <strong>of</strong>ten are<br />

used to ensure accuracy <strong>of</strong> station polarities <strong>and</strong> to correct the polarities if<br />

necessary (Houck et al., 1976).<br />

Because the P-wave first motion plot depends on the earthquake location<br />

<strong>and</strong> the take-<strong>of</strong>f angles <strong>of</strong> seismic rays, one must have a reasonably

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!