15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9. Discussion<br />

Microearthquake studies have grown tremendously in the last two decades.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>microearthquake</strong>s as a tool in underst<strong>and</strong>ing tectonic<br />

processes was recognized in the 1950s. Permanent <strong>networks</strong> <strong>and</strong> portable<br />

arrays were developed specifically for studying <strong>microearthquake</strong>s. Telemetry<br />

transmission was tested <strong>and</strong> proved feasible. In the 1960s, instrumentation<br />

development for telemetered <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong><br />

was started. Many data acquisition <strong>and</strong> processing procedures were automated,<br />

including hypocenter locations by computers.<br />

With funds available for research in earthquake hazards reduction (especially<br />

for earthquake prediction), many <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong><br />

were established in the 1970s. Telemetry transmission <strong>and</strong> centralized<br />

recording systems were improved. Much effort went into streamlining<br />

data acquisition <strong>and</strong> processing procedures, but progress has been slow.<br />

More intensive use <strong>of</strong> computers to analyze <strong>microearthquake</strong> data increased<br />

our knowledge about the distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>microearthquake</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

their relation to the faulting process. However, we also learned that <strong>microearthquake</strong><br />

<strong>networks</strong> can generate far greater amounts <strong>of</strong> data than<br />

can be coped with effectively. To help solve this problem, a combined<br />

effort by the USGS <strong>and</strong> several universities to develop interactive computing<br />

facilities for <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong> has been undertaken by<br />

P. L. Ward <strong>and</strong> colleagues (1980). There is also an increasing use <strong>of</strong><br />

digital electronics <strong>and</strong> microprocessors to collect, process, <strong>and</strong> analyze<br />

<strong>microearthquake</strong> data (see, e.g., Allen <strong>and</strong> Ellis, 1980: Prothero, 1980).<br />

The capital cost for either a permanent station or a temporary station is<br />

about $SoOO. The total operating cost for a permanent station is also about<br />

$5000 per year, <strong>and</strong> that for a temporary station may be a few times more.<br />

Given a limited amount <strong>of</strong> financial support, it may not be effective to<br />

operate a dense <strong>microearthquake</strong> network <strong>of</strong> permanent stations over a<br />

large area. An alternative is to have a relatively sparse network <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

stations <strong>and</strong> to use a mobile array <strong>of</strong> temporary stations that provides<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!