principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9. Discussion<br />
Microearthquake studies have grown tremendously in the last two decades.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>microearthquake</strong>s as a tool in underst<strong>and</strong>ing tectonic<br />
processes was recognized in the 1950s. Permanent <strong>networks</strong> <strong>and</strong> portable<br />
arrays were developed specifically for studying <strong>microearthquake</strong>s. Telemetry<br />
transmission was tested <strong>and</strong> proved feasible. In the 1960s, instrumentation<br />
development for telemetered <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong><br />
was started. Many data acquisition <strong>and</strong> processing procedures were automated,<br />
including hypocenter locations by computers.<br />
With funds available for research in earthquake hazards reduction (especially<br />
for earthquake prediction), many <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong><br />
were established in the 1970s. Telemetry transmission <strong>and</strong> centralized<br />
recording systems were improved. Much effort went into streamlining<br />
data acquisition <strong>and</strong> processing procedures, but progress has been slow.<br />
More intensive use <strong>of</strong> computers to analyze <strong>microearthquake</strong> data increased<br />
our knowledge about the distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>microearthquake</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />
their relation to the faulting process. However, we also learned that <strong>microearthquake</strong><br />
<strong>networks</strong> can generate far greater amounts <strong>of</strong> data than<br />
can be coped with effectively. To help solve this problem, a combined<br />
effort by the USGS <strong>and</strong> several universities to develop interactive computing<br />
facilities for <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong> has been undertaken by<br />
P. L. Ward <strong>and</strong> colleagues (1980). There is also an increasing use <strong>of</strong><br />
digital electronics <strong>and</strong> microprocessors to collect, process, <strong>and</strong> analyze<br />
<strong>microearthquake</strong> data (see, e.g., Allen <strong>and</strong> Ellis, 1980: Prothero, 1980).<br />
The capital cost for either a permanent station or a temporary station is<br />
about $SoOO. The total operating cost for a permanent station is also about<br />
$5000 per year, <strong>and</strong> that for a temporary station may be a few times more.<br />
Given a limited amount <strong>of</strong> financial support, it may not be effective to<br />
operate a dense <strong>microearthquake</strong> network <strong>of</strong> permanent stations over a<br />
large area. An alternative is to have a relatively sparse network <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />
stations <strong>and</strong> to use a mobile array <strong>of</strong> temporary stations that provides<br />
223