15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 6. Methods <strong>of</strong> Data Analysis<br />

x* + 6x, <strong>and</strong> repeat the same procedure until some cut<strong>of</strong>f criteria are<br />

satisfied to stop the iteration. In other words, the nonlinear earthquake<br />

location problem is solved by an iterative procedure involving only solutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> four linear equations.<br />

Instead <strong>of</strong> solving an even-determined system <strong>of</strong> four linear equations<br />

as given by Eq. (6.14), we may derive an equivalent overdetermined system<br />

<strong>of</strong> rn linear equations from Eq. (6.11) as<br />

(6.18) A6x = -r<br />

where the Jacobian matrix A is given by Eq. (6.13). Equation (6.18) is a set<br />

<strong>of</strong> rn equations written in matrix form, <strong>and</strong> by Eqs. (6.9), (6.10), <strong>and</strong><br />

(6.13), it may be rewritten as<br />

By using generalized inversion as discussed in Chapter 5, the system <strong>of</strong> rn<br />

equations as given by Eq. (6.19) may be solved directly for the adjustments<br />

St, Sx, Sy, <strong>and</strong> Sz. This way, we may avoid some <strong>of</strong> the computational<br />

difficulties associated with solving the normal equations as discussed<br />

in Section 5.3.2.<br />

6.1.3. Implementation <strong>of</strong> Geiger’s Method<br />

Geiger’s method as derived in the previous subsection is computationally<br />

straightforward, but the method is too tedious for h<strong>and</strong> computation<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence was ignored by seismologists for nearly 50 years. In the late<br />

1950s digital computers became generally available, <strong>and</strong> several seismologists<br />

quickly seized this opportunity to implement Geiger’s method<br />

for determining origin time <strong>and</strong> hypocenter (e.g., Bolt, 1960; Flinn, 1960;<br />

Nordquist, 1962; Bolt <strong>and</strong> Turcotte, 1964; Engdahl <strong>and</strong> Gunst, 1966).<br />

Since then, many additional computer programs have been written for this<br />

problem, especially for locating local earthquakes (e.g., Eaton, 1969;<br />

Crampin, 1970; Lee <strong>and</strong> Lahr, 1975; Shapira <strong>and</strong> Bath, 1977; Klein, 1978;<br />

Herrmann, 1979; Johnson, 1979; Lahr, 1979; Lee ef al., 1981).<br />

In deriving Geiger’s method, we have not specified any particular seismic<br />

arrival times. Normally, the method is applied only to first P-arrival<br />

times because first P-arrivals are easier to identify on seismograms <strong>and</strong> the<br />

P-velocity structure <strong>of</strong> the earth is better known. However, if arrival<br />

times <strong>of</strong> later phases (such as S, P,, etc.) are available, we can set up

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!