15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158 6. Methods <strong>of</strong> Data Analysis<br />

6.5 Quantification <strong>of</strong> Earthquakes<br />

As pointed out by Kanamori (1978b), it is not a simple matter to find a<br />

single measure <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> an earthquake, because earthquakes result<br />

from complex physical processes. In the previous section, we described<br />

the Richter magnitude scale <strong>and</strong> its extensions. Since Richter magnitude is<br />

defined empirically, it is desirable to relate it to the physical processes <strong>of</strong><br />

earthquakes. In the past 30 years, considerable advances have been made<br />

in relating parameters describing an earthquake source with observed<br />

ground motion. Readers are referred to an excellent treatise on quantitative<br />

methods in seismology by Aki <strong>and</strong> Richards (1980).<br />

6.5.1. Quantitative Models <strong>of</strong> Earthquakes<br />

Reid's elastic rebound theory (Reid, 1910) suggests that earthquakes<br />

originate from spontaneous slippage on active faults after a long period <strong>of</strong><br />

elastic strain accumulation. Faults may be considered as the slip surfaces<br />

across which discontinuous displacement occurs in the earth, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

faulting process may be modeled mathematically as a shear dislocation in<br />

an elastic medium (see Savage, 1978, for a review). A shear dislocation<br />

(i.e., slip) is equivalent to a double-couple body force (Maruyama, 1963;<br />

Burridge <strong>and</strong> Knop<strong>of</strong>f, 1964). The scaling parameter <strong>of</strong> each component<br />

couple <strong>of</strong> a double-couple body force is its moment. Using the equivalence<br />

between slip <strong>and</strong> body forces, Aki (1966) introduced the seismic<br />

moment Mo as<br />

(6.45) Mo = pL4D(A) clA = pnA<br />

where p is the shear modulus <strong>of</strong> the medium, A is the area <strong>of</strong> the slipped<br />

surface or source area, <strong>and</strong> D is the slip D(A) averaged over the area A.<br />

Hence the seismic moment <strong>of</strong> an earthquake is a direct measure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> an earthquake caused by fault slip. If an earthquake occurs<br />

with surface faulting, we may estimate its rupture length L<strong>and</strong> its average<br />

slip 0. The source area A may be approximated by Lh, where h is the<br />

focal depth. A reasonable estimate for 1 is 3 x 10" dynedcm'. With these<br />

quantities, we can estimate the seismic moment using Eq. (6.45). For<br />

more discussion on seismic moment, readers may refer to Brune ( 1976),<br />

<strong>and</strong> Aki <strong>and</strong> Richards (1980).<br />

From dislocation theory, the seismic moment can be related to the<br />

far-field seismic displacement recorded by seismographs. For example,<br />

Hanks <strong>and</strong> Wyss (1972) showed how to determine seismic source param-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!