principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.5. Quantificatioii <strong>of</strong> Earthquakes 161<br />
tied to Richter’s local magnitude M,, one would expect that this<br />
moment-magnitude scale is also consistent with MD in the range <strong>of</strong> 0-3.<br />
However, this consistency is yet to be confirmed.<br />
Many present-day <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong> are not yet sufficiently<br />
equipped <strong>and</strong> calibrated for spectral analysis <strong>of</strong> recorded ground motion.<br />
In the past, special broadb<strong>and</strong> instruments with high dynamic range recording<br />
have been constructed by various research groups for spectral<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> local earthquakes (e.g., Tsujiura, 1966, 1978; Tucker <strong>and</strong><br />
Brune, 1973: Johnson <strong>and</strong> McEvilly, 1974; Bakun et d., 1976; Helmberger<br />
<strong>and</strong> Johnson, 1977; Rautian et lil., 1978). Alternatively, one uses accelerograms<br />
from strong motion instruments (e.g., Anderson <strong>and</strong><br />
Fletcher, 1976; Boatwright, 1978). Several authors have used recordings<br />
from <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong> for spectral studies (e.g., Douglas et ul.,<br />
1970; Douglas <strong>and</strong> Ryall, 1972; Bakun <strong>and</strong> Lindh, 1977: Bakun et al.,<br />
1978b). In addition, O’Neill <strong>and</strong> Healy ( 1973) proposed a simple method <strong>of</strong><br />
estimating source dimensions <strong>and</strong> stress drops <strong>of</strong> small earthquakes using<br />
P-wave rise time recorded by <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong>.<br />
In order to determine earthquake source parameters from seismograms,<br />
it is necessary in general to have broadb<strong>and</strong>, on-scale records in digital<br />
form. If such records were available, D. J. Andrews (written communication,<br />
1979) suggested that it would be desirable to determine the following<br />
two integrals:<br />
(6.60)<br />
where u is ground displacement, 14 is ground velocity, t is time, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
integrals are over the time duration <strong>of</strong> each seismic phase or over the<br />
entire record. At distances much greater than the source dimension, both<br />
displacement <strong>and</strong> velocity <strong>of</strong> ground motion return to zero after the passage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the seismic waves. Thus the two integrals given by Eq. (6.60) are<br />
the two simplest nonvanishing integrals <strong>of</strong> the ground motion. The integral<br />
A is the long-period spectral level Ro <strong>and</strong> is related to seismic moment by<br />
Eq. (6.46). The integral B is proportional to the energy that is propagated<br />
to the station. If the spectrum <strong>of</strong> ground motion follows the simple Brune<br />
( 1970) model with F = 1. the corner frequency fo is related to the integrals<br />
A <strong>and</strong> B by<br />
(6.61 1<br />
Whereas the numerical coefficient may be different in other models, the<br />
quantity Z31’3/A2’3. having dimension <strong>of</strong> time-’, can be expected to be a<br />
robust measure <strong>of</strong> a characteristic frequency. Andrews believes that this<br />
procedure is better than the traditional method <strong>of</strong> finding corner frequency