15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

220 8. Applications fw Earthquake Prediction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fault plane, <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 5-20', at the time <strong>of</strong> the main shock. As<br />

an alternative explanation, they suggested changes in the attenuation<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> the material surrounding the focal regions.<br />

Jones <strong>and</strong> Molnar (1979) measured amplitude ratios (P/S) for foreshocks<br />

from three earthquake sequences-ne in the Philippines <strong>and</strong> two in eastern<br />

Europe. They used seismograms recorded at WWSSN stations that<br />

were sufficiently close to these earthquakes so that the foreshocks were<br />

well recorded. The amplitude ratios were found to be stable with time for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the foreshock sequences, suggesting that the focal mechanisms for<br />

the foreshocks did not change.<br />

Theoretical expressions for the amplitude ratio P/SV derived by<br />

Kisslinger (1980) show that this ratio cannot distinguish between conjugate<br />

mechanisms or determine the sense <strong>of</strong> slip on the fault plane. He<br />

suggested that routine observations <strong>of</strong> the P/SV ratio at a well-placed<br />

station could detect changes in focal mechanisms without the need for<br />

more detailed fault-plane solutions. Such solutions usually are based on<br />

the directions <strong>of</strong> the first P-motions from vertical-component seismograms<br />

(see Section 6.2) <strong>and</strong> may be supplemented by the polarization directions<br />

for the S-arrivals from three-component seismograms. The orientation <strong>of</strong><br />

the principal stress axes may be inferred from fault-plane solutions.<br />

Changes in the orientation <strong>of</strong> the compressional stress axes have been<br />

investigated as a possible earthquake precursor, <strong>and</strong> we now summarize a<br />

few examples.<br />

The orientation <strong>of</strong> the compressional stress axes using small earthquakes<br />

has been studied in the Garm region, USSR. Nersesov et NI.<br />

(1973) identified three stages <strong>of</strong> temporal behavior: (1) a quiet period,<br />

lasting several years, was characterized by r<strong>and</strong>om distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

azimuths <strong>of</strong> the compressional stress axes; (2) a shorter period, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

order <strong>of</strong> I year, was distinguished by an alignment <strong>of</strong> the compressional<br />

stress axes along one <strong>of</strong> the two preferred directions, in this case 110-170";<br />

<strong>and</strong> (3) a period beginning 3 to 4 months before the main shock was<br />

characterized by a process <strong>of</strong> realignment, in which the axes <strong>of</strong> compressional<br />

stress rotated to the second preferred direction, in this case 15-70'.<br />

After the main shock, the stress system returned to its initial state as<br />

described by (1).<br />

Bolt et al. ( 1977) studied the Briones Hills earthquake swarm <strong>of</strong> January<br />

1977 in central California, in which the largest event (ML = 4.3) was<br />

considered to be the main shock. The fault-plane solution for the main<br />

shock was found to be consistent with the regional right-lateral, strike-slip<br />

motion along a northwest trending fault. The largest foreshock (ML = 4.0)<br />

had a fault-plane solution that was rotated approximately 90" clockwise<br />

from that <strong>of</strong> the main shock. The waveforms recorded at a station about 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!