15.11.2014 Views

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

principles and applications of microearthquake networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 3. Data Processirig Procedures<br />

ignored <strong>and</strong> the same procedure was repeated for the next first P-arrival<br />

time detected. For a small <strong>microearthquake</strong> network in which the first<br />

P-arrivals <strong>of</strong> the desired earthquakes can be expected to reach all the<br />

stations, the time window may be set to be the maximum propagation time<br />

across the network. For example, Crampin <strong>and</strong> Fyfe (1974) used a 16-sec<br />

time window for the 100-km aperture LOWNET array in Scotl<strong>and</strong>. They<br />

required that a valid earthquake must have at least three stations reporting<br />

first P-arrival times within this time window.<br />

Because more than one earthquake may occur within one minute in a<br />

large <strong>microearthquake</strong> network, Stewart (1977) carried out additional<br />

tests on the first P-arrival time data to separate earthquakes with similar<br />

origin times. His approach considers first the time relationship <strong>and</strong> then<br />

the spatial relationship <strong>of</strong> the first P-arrival time data. If a gap <strong>of</strong> 8 sec or<br />

more is found between successive arrival times, then the arrival times<br />

before that gap are separated out as one subset <strong>of</strong> time-coherent data to be<br />

examined further for spatial coherence. The 8-sec gap is chosen for the<br />

USGS Central California Microearthquake Network from considerations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the station spacing <strong>and</strong> the P-velocity structure beneath this network.<br />

In order to consider the spatial relationship <strong>of</strong> the first P-arrival time data,<br />

the network is subdivided into eight distinct geographic zones <strong>and</strong> each<br />

station is assigned to only one zone. For a given subset <strong>of</strong> time-coherent<br />

data, the number <strong>of</strong> first P-arrivals in pairs <strong>of</strong> adjacent zones is counted. If<br />

this number is greater than 3, then the first P-arrival time data in such<br />

zones are considered to belong to one earthquake event. If this is not the<br />

case, then those data that fail the test are discarded <strong>and</strong> the remaining data<br />

in this time-coherent subset are examined in a similar manner. The details<br />

<strong>of</strong> this approach are described in Stewart (1977).<br />

3.5. Computing Hypocenter Parameters<br />

The hypocenter parameters calculated routinely for <strong>microearthquake</strong>s<br />

include the origin time, epicenter coordinates, focal depth, magnitude,<br />

<strong>and</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> their errors. If enough first-motion data are available, a<br />

plot <strong>of</strong> the first P-motions on the focal sphere is also made. In this section,<br />

we describe some <strong>of</strong> the practical aspects <strong>of</strong> computing these parameters<br />

with examples taken from two large <strong>microearthquake</strong> <strong>networks</strong> in California.<br />

The mathematical aspects <strong>of</strong> hypocenter calculation, fault-plane<br />

solution, <strong>and</strong> magnitude estimation will be treated in Chapter 6.<br />

Because hypocenter parameters are usually calculated by digital computers,<br />

there are three basic approaches in obtaining the results. Each<br />

approach is iterative in nature since errors in the input data are unavoid-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!