principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
principles and applications of microearthquake networks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.4. Estimation <strong>of</strong> Earthquake Magnitude 153<br />
the simultaneous inversion without having to solve a very large set <strong>of</strong><br />
equations. Furthermore, explosion data also can be included in the inversion.<br />
Since the velocity can be different from block to block in the simultaneous<br />
inversion problem, three-dimensional ray tracing must be used in<br />
computing travel times <strong>and</strong> derivatives in step 2. The problem <strong>of</strong> ray<br />
tracing in a heterogeneous medium has been discussed in Chapter 4. For<br />
an application <strong>of</strong> simultaneous inversion using data from a <strong>microearthquake</strong><br />
network, readers may refer, for example, to Lee et a/. (1982a).<br />
6.4. Estimation <strong>of</strong> Earthquake Magnitude<br />
Intensity <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>and</strong> amplitudes <strong>of</strong> ground motion recorded by seismographs<br />
show that there are large variations in the size <strong>of</strong> earthquakes.<br />
Earthquake intensity is a measure <strong>of</strong> effects (e.g., broken windows, collapsed<br />
houses, etc.) produced by an earthquake at a particular point <strong>of</strong><br />
observation. Thus, the effects <strong>of</strong> an earthquake may be collapsed houses<br />
at city A, broken windows at city B, <strong>and</strong> almost nothing damaged at city<br />
C. Unfortunately, intensity observations are subject to uncertainties <strong>of</strong><br />
personal estimates <strong>and</strong> are limited by circumstances <strong>of</strong> reported effects.<br />
Therefore, it is desirable to have a scale for rating earthquakes in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
their energy, independent <strong>of</strong> the effects produced in populated areas.<br />
In response to this practical need, C. F. Richter proposed a magnitude<br />
scale in 1935 based solely on amplitudes <strong>of</strong> ground motion recorded by<br />
seismographs. Richter’s procedure to estimate earthquake magnitude followed<br />
a practice by Wadati (193 1) in which the calculated ground amplitudes<br />
in microns for various Japanese stations were plotted against their<br />
epicentral distances. Wadati employed the resulting amplitude-vsdistance<br />
curves to distinguish between deep <strong>and</strong> shallow earthquakes, to<br />
calculate the absorption coefficient for surface waves, <strong>and</strong> to make a<br />
rough comparison between the sizes <strong>of</strong> several strong earthquakes. Realizing<br />
that no great precision is needed, Richter (1935) took several bold<br />
steps to make the estimation <strong>of</strong> earthquake magnitude simple <strong>and</strong> easy to<br />
carry out. Consequently, Richter’s magnitude scale has been widely accepted,<br />
<strong>and</strong> quantification <strong>of</strong> earthquakes has become an active research<br />
topic in seismology.<br />
6.4.1. Local Magnitude for Southern California Earthquakes<br />
The Richter magnitude scale was originally devised for local earthquakes<br />
in southern California. Richter recognized that these earth-